Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A formal power series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is a unit

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring and f=∑n≥0anxn∈R⟦x⟧. Then f is a unit in R⟦x⟧ if and only if a0 is a unit in R.

When a0 is a unit, the inverse g=∑n≥0bnxn is unique and is determined by

b0=a0−1,bn=−a0−1∑i=1naibn−i(n≥1).

The criterion also holds in the zero ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · solve the inverse equations recursively
1.1givenF1F3

If fg=1, constant-coefficient extraction gives a0[x0]g=1. Commutativity gives the reverse product too, so a0 is a unit.

1.2givenF1F2

Conversely suppose a0 is a unit and define bn by the displayed recursion. The coefficient of fg at 0 is a0b0=1. For n≥1 it is a0bn+∑i=1naibn−i=0. Hence fg=1 by extensionality, and commutativity gives gf=1.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2givenF3F4

Any inverse must satisfy the same constant equation and then, successively, the same equation for each bn; multiplication by a0−1 makes every coefficient unique. In the zero ring, 0=1 and the unit theorem makes the same recursion and equivalence valid.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both directions, while step 2.1 proves uniqueness and the boundary case.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources