How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Formal unramifiedness iff Omega vanishes
Statement
Let be a morphism of schemes. Then is formally unramified (Formally unramified morphism) if and only if (Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials). No finite-type, finite-presentation, flatness or separatedness hypothesis is imposed on , and no existence of lifts is asserted in either direction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A morphism of schemes .
Formally unramified morphism: is formally unramified if for every square-zero thickening over and every -morphism there is at most one -morphism restricting to it; over affine opens this says that two -algebra maps into a ring with square-zero ideal that agree modulo are equal.
The diagonal ideal modulo its square is Omega: for a ring map and one has via .
Universal property of relative differential sheaves: for every -module the map is a bijection .
Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials: for an affine open lying over an affine open one has ; hence if and only if for all such charts.
Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials: an -derivation is additive, satisfies Leibniz, and kills the image of the structure map from .
Closed immersions of schemes and Schemes and morphisms over a base: a closed immersion with ideal sheaf is a square-zero thickening when ; a morphism is determined by its map of structure sheaves, so two morphisms of schemes are equal exactly when their sheaf maps are.
Proof
Assume ; we show that lifts are unique. Let be a square-zero thickening over and let be an -morphism with two -morphism lifts . Since and have the same underlying map on points, the direct images and are the same sheaf of rings pushed forward along this common map, and both and are maps ; the difference is a morphism of sheaves of abelian groups valued in , where , because and agree on after composition with . The sheaf is an -module through , and is an -derivation: it is additive, and for local sections of one has , since and . It kills the image of because and are -morphisms. By [F3] with and , , so , that is ; by [F6] . Hence is formally unramified.
Assume formally unramified; we show on every affine chart. Let be affine over an affine open , put with , and let be the quotient. The ideal has square zero, so is a square-zero thickening over ; the two -algebra maps and from to both compose with to the identity, so the -morphisms induced by agree on . By [F1] applied to this thickening, , and therefore the maps on global sections agree: . Hence in for all , that is , and [F2] gives .
Conclusion. Step 1.1 proves that implies that is formally unramified and step 1.2 that a formally unramified has on every affine chart, hence by [F4]. This proves the equivalence; nowhere were finiteness, flatness or separatedness used, and no lift was constructed, only used for uniqueness in step 1.1.
Depends on
Formally unramified morphism
The diagonal ideal modulo its square is Omega
Universal property of relative differential sheaves
The diagonal morphism
Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials
Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials
Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified
Schemes and morphisms over a base
Closed immersions of schemes