How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The fundamental theorem of finite Galois theory
Statement
Let be finite Galois and let . The assignments and are mutually inverse inclusion-reversing bijections between subgroups and intermediate fields . Moreover,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite Galois extension , its finite group , the fact that is finite Galois for every intermediate field (A finite Galois extension is Galois over every intermediate field), the tower law (Tower law for finite extensions: ), and the finite-group formula (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
If is a finite group of automorphisms of , then and (Artin's fixed-field theorem: and ).
For a finite extension with , being Galois, being the splitting field of a separable polynomial, , and are equivalent (Equivalent characterizations of a finite Galois extension).
Proof
For the subgroup-to-field-to-subgroup direction, Artin applied to gives . This includes , whose fixed field is , and .
For the field-to-subgroup-to-field direction, put . Since is finite Galois, [L2] gives . Artin gives , while ; the tower law forces . This includes and .
If , then every element fixed by is fixed by , so ; the reverse map is likewise inclusion-reversing. Artin gives , while [L2] applied to gives , so the tower and Lagrange formulas give . Together with steps 1.1 and 1.2 these statements prove the claimed bijections and degree formulas.