How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Product on ordinary differential cohomology
Statement
Assume full AC, the category-level geometric input of Character-diagram geometric input conditions, the good-cover comparison input of Good-cover Cech-to-singular comparison input, and a Deligne cup-product input as in Deligne cup-product input data. Then on , for every the ordinary Cheeger–Simons character groups admit natural products that are associative and graded-commutative, preserve the integral cup product and wedge product of curvatures, and obey .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC, the stated category-level input on , and a Deligne cup-product input.
Deligne cup-product input data gives natural associative graded-commutative products on Deligne classes and states the , , and form-action identities.
Deligne and Cheeger–Simons models agree under geometric cycle inputs conditionally gives a natural isomorphism commuting with , , pullback and form action.
Proof
For and define . The inverse exists by [F2], and bilinearity follows by applying the homomorphisms , the bilinear Deligne product, and .
Naturality follows by applying the naturality square for and the pullback-natural Deligne product in [F1]. Associativity and graded commutativity follow by applying the injective map to the two sides and using the corresponding Deligne identities. Since [F2] commutes with , and , the Deligne identities in [F1] transport respectively to the integral cup-product identity, the curvature wedge-product identity, and . These are conditional deductions; this proof does not establish existence of the Deligne cup-product input.
Remarks
The local cochain construction and its omitted verifications are not promoted to a proved supplier here. This item is escalated until the conditional Deligne product data are supplied by a complete local construction and the Character Diagram geometric input has a current readiness record.