Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian

Statement

Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then the polynomial ring R[x] is a Noetherian commutative ring.

No hypothesis beyond Noetherianity is placed on R: it may have zero divisors, and it may be the zero ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian commutative ring R and its polynomial ring R[x].

[L1]

For every commutative ring R, the coefficientwise addition and convolution multiplication make R[x] a commutative ring, and the constant-polynomial map R→R[x] is an injective unital ring homomorphism (Polynomial convolution makes R[x] a commutative ring containing R as its constant subring).

[L2]

Over a Noetherian commutative ring R, every ideal of R[x] is generated by finitely many polynomials realising generators of its stage ideals up to a stabilisation degree; in particular every ideal of R[x] is finitely generated (Over a Noetherian ring, an ideal of R[x] is generated by finitely many polynomials realising generators of its stages up to the stabilisation degree).

[L3]

A commutative ring whose ideals are all finitely generated is Noetherian. This is the choice-free implication 2⇒1 of A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member, established by the regular-module/ideal identification in its proof steps 1.1–3.1. Its dependent-choice assumption is used only to pass from ACC to the maximal condition; that implication is not used here.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

R[x] is a commutative ring.

2.1L2step 1.1

Every ideal of R[x] is finitely generated, by the finite-generation lemma applied to the Noetherian ring R.

3.1L3step 1.1step 2.1∎

Apply only the choice-free finite-generation-to-Noetherian implication in [L3] to the commutative ring R[x] from step 1.1 and the finite generation from step 2.1. Thus R[x] is Noetherian; no passage through the DC-dependent maximal condition is made.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources