How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hilbert basis theorem: if is Noetherian then is Noetherian
Statement
Let be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then the polynomial ring is a Noetherian commutative ring.
No hypothesis beyond Noetherianity is placed on : it may have zero divisors, and it may be the zero ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian commutative ring and its polynomial ring .
For every commutative ring , the coefficientwise addition and convolution multiplication make a commutative ring, and the constant-polynomial map is an injective unital ring homomorphism (Polynomial convolution makes a commutative ring containing as its constant subring).
Over a Noetherian commutative ring , every ideal of is generated by finitely many polynomials realising generators of its stage ideals up to a stabilisation degree; in particular every ideal of is finitely generated (Over a Noetherian ring, an ideal of is generated by finitely many polynomials realising generators of its stages up to the stabilisation degree).
A commutative ring whose ideals are all finitely generated is Noetherian. This is the choice-free implication of A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member, established by the regular-module/ideal identification in its proof steps 1.1–3.1. Its dependent-choice assumption is used only to pass from ACC to the maximal condition; that implication is not used here.
Proof
is a commutative ring.
Every ideal of is finitely generated, by the finite-generation lemma applied to the Noetherian ring .
Apply only the choice-free finite-generation-to-Noetherian implication in [L3] to the commutative ring from step 1.1 and the finite generation from step 2.1. Thus is Noetherian; no passage through the DC-dependent maximal condition is made.
Remarks
-
The work is in the lemmas, and it is of three separate kinds. The stage ideals and their ascent are The leading coefficients of the degree- elements of an ideal of , together with , form an ideal of , and these ideals ascend with and use no chain condition; the one degree-lowering step is A single cancellation step lowers the degree of a polynomial in an ideal once its leading coefficient lies in a realised stage and uses no chain condition either; the passage to a finite generating list is Over a Noetherian ring, an ideal of is generated by finitely many polynomials realising generators of its stages up to the stabilisation degree and is where the Noetherian hypothesis is spent. Keeping them apart is what makes each checkable on its own.
-
No leading coefficient is inverted anywhere. A reader who has seen the argument only over a field may expect a division step; over a general commutative ring the stage ideals carry that role, which is why they are ideals of rather than single elements.
Depends on
A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member
Over a Noetherian ring, an ideal of is generated by finitely many polynomials realising generators of its stages up to the stabilisation degree
Polynomial convolution makes a commutative ring containing as its constant subring
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., (16.11) and (16.12)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §3 Theorem 3.7
- B. Totaro, Commutative Algebra (Michaelmas 2011), notes by Z. Norwood, §8 Theorem 8.3
- M. Hochster, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Math 614, Theorem 5.6