Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Variational characterisation of the nearest point

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let H be a real or complex Hilbert space, let C⊆H be closed and convex with x∈H, and let p∈C. Then p is the nearest point of C to x if and only if

Re⁡⟨x−p, y−p⟩≤0for every y∈C.

In particular, for the nearest point the inequality holds, and conversely any p∈C satisfying the inequality is nearest.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

C is convex: p+t(y−p)∈C for y∈C and 0≤t≤1; and p is nearest exactly when ∥x−p∥≤∥x−y∥ for every y∈C (Convex sets and continuous real-hyperplane separation in a normed space).

[A2]

The pairing is linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second, with ∥v∥2=⟨v,v⟩ (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).

[A3]

Countable Choice is the selection principle consumed by the existence theorem for nearest points (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Countable Choice, a closed convex set C, a vector x and a point p∈C.

1.1A1A2algebra

Suppose first that p is nearest, and let y∈C; for every t with 0<t≤1 the convexity hypothesis gives p+t(y−p)∈C, so ∥x−p∥2≤∥x−p−t(y−p)∥2=∥x−p∥2−2tRe⁡⟨x−p,y−p⟩+t2∥y−p∥2, whence 2Re⁡⟨x−p,y−p⟩≤t∥y−p∥2, and if Re⁡⟨x−p,y−p⟩ were positive the choice t<min⁡{1, 2Re⁡⟨x−p,y−p⟩/(∥y−p∥2+1)} would make the right-hand side strictly smaller than the left, a contradiction; hence Re⁡⟨x−p,y−p⟩≤0.

1.2A1A2algebra

Conversely suppose Re⁡⟨x−p,y−p⟩≤0 for every y∈C; then ∥x−y∥2=∥(x−p)+(p−y)∥2=∥x−p∥2+2Re⁡⟨x−p,p−y⟩+∥p−y∥2≥∥x−p∥2, because Re⁡⟨x−p,p−y⟩=−Re⁡⟨x−p,y−p⟩≥0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2A3∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both implications of the stated equivalence; the Countable Choice hypothesis is used only to invoke the existence theorem for nearest points (Projection onto a nonempty closed convex set) when the nearest point is not supplied, while the equivalence itself is choice-free for a given p.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources