How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Invariant-factor decomposition of a finitely generated module over a PID
Statement
Every finitely generated PID module is a finite free module direct-summed with cyclic torsion quotients. Precisely, if is finitely generated over a PID , then
where each is a nonzero nonunit and . Every finitely generated PID module has an invariant-factor decomposition. This assertion is existence; uniqueness is proved separately.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finitely generated module , quotient modules (Quotient module with scalar multiplication on additive cosets), and the first isomorphism theorem for modules (First isomorphism theorem for modules: ).
For a submodule of a free PID module of finite rank , there are a basis of and nonzero elements with such that is a basis of (Simultaneous bases for a submodule of a finite free module over a PID).
Proof
Choose generators of and define the surjection by sending the standard basis to them; put . For the zero module one may take .
Apply [L1] to . There is a basis of and a basis of , with nonzero .
The first isomorphism theorem and coordinatewise quotient give . Any unit contributes the zero quotient and is removed; the remaining nonunit factors preserve the divisibility chain. This constructs the stated decomposition, including purely free, purely torsion, cyclic, and empty cases.