How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The long exact sequence in homology
Statement
Let be a short exact sequence of complexes in an abelian category. Then there is an exact sequence
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A short exact sequence of complexes.
Every chain map induces a well-defined map on homology (A chain map induces a well-defined map on homology).
The four local exactness claims around are provided by the preceding exactness lemmas (Exactness at the homology of the left complex, Exactness at the homology of the middle complex, Exactness at the homology of the right complex, Exactness at the target of the connecting map).
Proof
The maps and are defined by [L1], and the connecting map is defined by The connecting morphism in homology. Thus the displayed sequence exists in every degree.
For each integer , [L2] gives exactness at , , , and . Therefore every four-term window around is exact.
Since was arbitrary, these exact windows concatenate to the displayed bi-infinite exact sequence.