How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Mayer vietoris sequence in singular cohomology
Statement
For an open cover and any abelian group , there is a natural exact sequence Here is the pair of restrictions and . Naturality means continuous maps with and for the ordered covers, and coefficient homomorphisms. The connector is specified in the proof with this difference sign. Negative-degree groups are zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Short exact chain Mayer–Vietoris sequence gives the integral chain sequence with and , ending in the small complex .
The cover-small inclusion is a chain homotopy equivalence supplies a chain homotopy inverse to the inclusion .
Singular cochain complex with coefficients uses arbitrary simplex functions and positive coboundary; Singular cohomology with coefficients forms cocycles modulo coboundaries.
Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial gives natural cochain precomposition and coefficient postcomposition, commuting with coboundary.
Long exact sequence of a pair in singular cohomology fixes the positive extension-differential convention for connectors. The needed exactness chase for the present complexes is supplied below.
Proof
Given: The ordered cover and coefficients. Write , and , with positive cochain differentials. Their cohomologies mean kernel modulo image.
The dual of sends to its two restrictions , while the dual of sends to , by [F1]. The map is injective because is onto. If , their values agree on common simplices; assign the value from to a simplex in , and otherwise that from . This gives a unique cochain on the small basis and its restrictions are . Thus . Finally for a cochain on the intersection, extend it by zero to and pair this extension with zero on ; this maps to . All maps commute with differential by [F1] and [F3], proving termwise exact, including negative zero degrees.
Precomposition is a cochain homotopy equivalence. Indeed let be the chain homotopy inverse in [F2]. Precomposing with each of gives cochain maps in reverse order. If a chain homotopy satisfies , precomposition by gives ; the other inverse homotopy gives the other composite. At degree zero the homotopy with index is zero. Thus the induced map is an isomorphism. No Hom exactness theorem is used.
For a cocycle , lift it to by step 1.1. Then , so for a unique . Injectivity of and imply . If changes by , then changes by . If changes by , lift to and replace by , which leaves unchanged. Hence is well-defined; lifts of sums show it is additive. Define the asserted connector by . This uses the same positive sign as [F5]. Concretely, one may lift by where is zero extension to ; the small cocycle restricts to on and zero on .
At , images from map to zero. If a cocycle has , lift to and replace by . This is a cocycle in , hence equals for a unique cocycle , since is injective and commutes with differential. Thus this kernel equals the image from . The identification is coordinatewise: cycles and boundaries are respectively pairs of cycles and pairs of boundaries.
At , a class represented by with closed has zero connector. Conversely, if the connecting class of vanishes, its lift satisfies for some . Then is a cocycle lifting . At , a connecting representative satisfies , so its image is zero. Conversely if a cocycle has , then is a cocycle and its connector is . These arguments establish exactness at both positions in both directions. They include the initial injection because a global primitive in is necessarily zero.
Replace by through . The map to the two open sets is the actual pair of restrictions because restricts absolute cochains. The next map is the stated difference by step 1.1. Steps 2.2 and 3.1 give the exact sequence with connector from step 2.1. A map of ordered covers sends small chains to small chains and commutes with their inclusions and ; hence its cochain maps commute with and the canonical . Sending a lift through these maps gives a lift of the image of , and its differential is the image of . Thus it commutes with , and the commuting isomorphisms imply commutation with . Coefficient postcomposition has the same property. No naturality of the chosen chain inverse or of zero extension is required.
This proves the statement, naturally with its printed sign. If or is empty, the sequence has the remaining restriction as an identity and zero intersection groups. If , then is diagonal, , and the connector is zero since is a cochain lift. These include point spaces and empty ; zero coefficients and negative degrees give zero terms. At degree zero there are no negative primitives, as checked in step 3.1. The two-coordinate constructions need no infinite choice; the small-chain construction uses least subdivision depths and all cochain extensions use the specified zero. No AC is used.