How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Statement
(Equinumerous sets, and ): the plane of pairs of naturals is countably infinite (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).
The bijection is exhibited, not merely asserted to exist. Define by recursion on (The recursion theorem) by and , and set
Then is a bijection from onto , and is a bijection from onto , so is a bijection . What makes bijective is the decomposition of a nonzero natural into a power of two times an odd number, existence and uniqueness both.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Addition and multiplication on with , , and (Addition of natural numbers, Multiplication of natural numbers); . Call even if for some and odd if for some .
Recursion: for a set , and there is with and (The recursion theorem).
Peano: and is injective (The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system); every nonzero natural is a successor (Every nonzero natural number is a successor).
Arithmetic laws: and are commutative and associative, , , and (Addition is commutative, Addition is associative, Left identity for addition, Multiplication is commutative, Multiplication is associative, Zero and one under multiplication, Distributivity and the successor law for multiplication, Left successor law for addition).
Order laws: exactly one of , , holds (Trichotomy of the order on ); is reflexive, antisymmetric, transitive and total ( is a linear order on ), so is transitive and mixes with , in the sense that each of , and gives : transitivity of gives in every case, while would force or by antisymmetry, contradicting whichever of the two hypotheses is strict; and is irreflexive, because would demand (Order on the natural numbers); and (Order is compatible with addition); , so (Discreteness: is the immediate successor); and means for some (Order on the natural numbers), where moreover holds exactly when that is nonzero, since gives , while with would give and hence by additive cancellation (Addition is cancellative, Addition is commutative, Left identity for addition).
Cancellation: with gives (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor); and forces or (The natural numbers have no zero divisors).
Induction (The principle of mathematical induction) and strong induction (Strong (complete) induction).
Bijections, injections, surjections, composition and inverses (Injection, surjection, bijection); means a bijection exists (Equinumerous sets, and ).
Proof
Apply [L1] with , and : this defines with and for all .
Every natural is even or odd: by induction, is even; and if is even then is odd, while if is odd then is even, using and .
No natural is both even and odd, that is for all : if then ; if then , so ; in both cases the two sides differ by irreflexivity of .
is a bijection from onto : it is injective by [L2], its values are nonzero by [L2], and every nonzero natural is a value of by [L2].
for every : by induction, ; and if then for some by [L2], so .
for all : by induction on , at both sides are since and ; and if then .
Define by . Its values are nonzero: by step 2.1 and by [L2], so by [L5]. Thus maps into .
is injective. Suppose ; by [L4] we may assume , the other case being symmetric, and write . By step 2.2 the right side is , so cancelling the nonzero factor with [L5] and [L3] gives . If then by [L2] and , so the right side equals with , by [L3]; that would make both odd and even, contradicting step 1.3. Hence and , and then gives by injectivity of , whence because would force by [L4] and [L3], and symmetrically for .
is surjective onto : by strong induction [L6] we show every is or a value of . Let and assume the claim for all . By step 1.2, is odd or even. If then by [L3]. If then , since would give ; also by [L4], because with ; so the hypothesis at and give for some , and then by [L3] and step 1.1.
Therefore is a bijection from onto , and composing with the inverse of the bijection of step 1.4 yields the bijection ; hence and is countably infinite.
Remarks
-
Written out, , the standard bijection. The detour through avoids subtraction, which the naturals do not have as a total operation.
-
The proof is a proof of unique factorisation into a power of two times an odd number: step 4.2 is existence and step 4.1 is uniqueness. Nothing weaker would do, and no appeal to a picture of the diagonal enumeration is made anywhere. Nothing here uses any choice principle.
-
The Cantor pairing polynomial is also a bijection, with a choice-free inverse. Here the half is a uniquely determined natural, as the following argument shows; no division-with-remainder theorem is needed.
Define triangular numbers by and using recursion on the state (The recursion theorem). Induction using the arithmetic laws in [L3] gives : the base is zero, and doubling the recurrence gives . Uniqueness of a natural half follows from the strict increase of doubling, proved in step 4.1. Also , and induction gives (the increment is at least one), so these numbers are cofinal in .
For , take the least with (The well-ordering principle); such exists since . Since , write . Minimality gives . Strict increase makes this block unique: two different blocks are disjoint by transitivity. There is a unique natural with , by the definition of and additive cancellation in [L4]. The inequality gives , hence , so there is a unique natural with . This yields the unique pair with . Conversely, every pair has , hence its value lies in that block and is recovered by this construction. Thus the polynomial is a bijection. All arithmetic and induction used here are the declared facts [L3], [L4] and [L6].
Depends on
Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
Equinumerous sets, and
Injection, surjection, bijection
The natural numbers have no zero divisors
Strong (complete) induction
The recursion theorem
The principle of mathematical induction
The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system
Every nonzero natural number is a successor
Addition of natural numbers
Multiplication of natural numbers
Order on the natural numbers
The natural numbers (von Neumann)
Addition is commutative
Addition is associative
Addition is cancellative
Left identity for addition
Left successor law for addition
Multiplication is commutative
Multiplication is associative
Distributivity and the successor law for multiplication
Zero and one under multiplication
Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor
Order is compatible with addition
Trichotomy of the order on
is a linear order on
Discreteness: is the immediate successor
The well-ordering principle