How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
No retraction from a disk onto its boundary
Statement
For every integer , there is no continuous retraction of the closed unit ball onto its boundary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
For , is for and otherwise. For , and all other reduced groups vanish. Thus for , whereas . (Homology of spheres)
For any abelian group , and for every integer . For every set-indexed family of pairs the canonical map is an isomorphism. Together with the structural axioms, singular homology is an ordinary theory with coefficient group . (Singular homology satisfies dimension and arbitrary additivity)
If is a nonempty contractible topological space, then for every and every abelian group , where denotes a one-point space. (Contractible nonempty spaces have the homology of a point)
Proof
The disk contracts by . Thus its reduced integral homology is zero, by F3 and the point computation F2. In contrast by F1, including reduced when .
A retraction of the boundary inclusion would satisfy . Functoriality on reduced homology would factor the identity of through the zero group . That composite is zero, whereas the identity sends to , a contradiction.