Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-level Rabi model

Statement

Let σx,σy,σz be the Pauli matrices of Finite spin matrices (e), acting on C2, and let ℏ>0, δ,Ω∈R. Put H:=ℏ2(δσz+Ωσx),b:=δ2+Ω2. Then:

(a) H2=ℏ2b24I and the unitary group generated by −iH/ℏ is U(t)=cos⁡ ⁣(bt2)I−ibsin⁡ ⁣(bt2)(δσz+Ωσx), which solves iℏU′(t)=HU(t), U(0)=I; if b=0 the formula is read as U(t)=I.

(b) Squared transition amplitude. Put e↑=(1,0)T and e↓=(0,1)T, and use the inner product linear in its first argument from the Pauli supplier. Define the squared transition amplitude by p↓(t)=∣⟨e↓,U(t)e↑⟩∣2=Ω2b2sin⁡2 ⁣(bt2)(b>0). For b=0 it is p↓(t)=0 for every real t.

(c) Periodicity. For b>0 one has U(t+2π/b)=−U(t); the propagator is 2π/b-periodic up to the central sign −I, and every squared transition amplitude is 2π/b-periodic.

These are the exact mathematical dynamics of the stipulated finite matrix model; no physical identification of δ,Ω with a field or detuning and no measurement statistics is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Pauli matrices, ℏ>0, δ,Ω∈R, b=δ2+Ω2, H as above.

[F1]

Pauli algebra: σi2=I, σiσj=−σjσi for i≠j, σxσz=−iσy and the products σxσz+σzσx=0; hence (δσz+Ωσx)2=(δ2+Ω2)I (Finite spin matrices (e), algebra).

[F2]

For a finite matrix A, the series e−itA/ℏ=∑k≥0(−itA/ℏ)k/k! and its derivative series converge uniformly in operator norm on compact time intervals by scalar exponential majorants. Termwise differentiation gives iℏU′=AU and U(0)=I. For Hermitian A, (U∗U)′=0, so U∗U=I; finite-dimensional injectivity gives surjectivity and unitarity. The difference D of two solutions with the same initial value has (D∗D)′=0 and D(0)=0, so D=0. Uniqueness gives the group law. This local argument uses the norm conventions of The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum and A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, with no Choice or spectral theorem premise.

[F3]

The eigenvectors: e↑=(1,0), e↓=(0,1) satisfy σze↑=e↑, σze↓=−e↓, σxe↑=e↓, σxe↓=e↑ (Finite spin matrices (e)).

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

[Exponential form] By [F1], H is Hermitian and H2=ℏ2b2I/4. For b>0 put S=(δσz+Ωσx)/b, so S2=I. The even terms in the series of [F2] sum to cos⁡(bt/2)I, and its odd terms sum to −iS∑m≥0(−1)m(bt/2)2m+1/(2m+1)!=−iSsin⁡(bt/2). This gives the displayed U and its unique unitary group and equation by [F2]. If b=0, realness of δ,Ω gives δ=Ω=0, so H=0 and U=I.

2.1step 1.1F1F3algebra

[The transition amplitude] By [F3] and step 1.1, U(t)e↑=[cos⁡(bt/2)−iδsin⁡(bt/2)/b]e↑−iΩsin⁡(bt/2)e↓/b when b>0. Conjugate linearity in the second argument gives ⟨e↓,U(t)e↑⟩=+iΩsin⁡(bt/2)/b, whose squared modulus is Ω2sin⁡2(bt/2)/b2. If b=0, U=I and orthogonality gives p↓=0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

[Periodicity] For b>0, replacing t by t+2π/b in the closed form changes cos⁡,sin⁡ by their negatives; hence U(t+2π/b)=−U(t), and all squared transition amplitudes are 2π/b-periodic.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources