How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite set with has exactly bijections onto itself, and bijections onto any set of the same cardinality
Statement
Let be a finite set with and write
Then is finite and (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
More generally, for finite sets and write for the set of bijections . If then is finite with elements, and if then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Finite sets , , , with .
, and is finite (The number of injections from a -element set into an -element set is ).
Every injection of a finite set into itself is a bijection (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if , clause 4).
Cardinality (The cardinality of a finite set): a bijection transports finiteness and cardinality, and for finite , one has if and only if .
Maps (Injection, surjection, bijection, Equinumerous sets, and ): composites and inverses of bijections are bijections, and every bijection is an injection.
Proof
The two sets coincide: . Every bijection is an injection, and by [L2] every injection is a bijection, being finite.
Hence is finite with , by [L1] with and by [L3].
The two-set form. Suppose . Then by [L4], so fix a bijection . The map sends into and has the two-sided inverse , so it is a bijection; hence is finite with by step 2.1 and [L4]. If instead then by [L4], so no bijection exists at all.
The first assertion is step 2.1 and the second is step 3.1.
Remarks
-
No group vocabulary is used or needed. is written here as a set of bijections. Composition makes it a group, and that structure, together with the name symmetric group, is introduced in The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition ↗ later in the reading order; the pointer is orientation only and nothing above rests on it. The count proved here is what a later page needs in order to say that the symmetric group on letters has elements.
-
Why this is on the main page and not among the examples. Later pages consume this count, and an examples page is a leaf that nothing else may depend on.
-
The two-set form costs one line and is used immediately. The closed formula for counts the bijections between an initial segment and an arbitrary -element subset, which is exactly with .