Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-parameter subgroups are integral curves of left-invariant fields

Statement

Assume ACω. Let G be a finite-dimensional real Lie group with Lie algebra g=TeG.

If γ:R→G is a one-parameter subgroup and X=γ′(0), then

γ′(t)=d(Lγ(t))eX=Xγ(t)L

for every t∈R; thus γ is the integral curve through e of the left-invariant field XL. Conversely, the global integral curve through e of XL is a one-parameter subgroup. Consequently every X∈g determines a unique one-parameter subgroup with initial velocity X.

The countable-choice assumption is used exactly through the supplied smooth invariant-field construction and completeness theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a finite-dimensional real Lie group G with identity e, and X∈g=TeG.

[F1]

ACω is countable choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω).

[F2]

A one-parameter subgroup is a smooth homomorphism γ:(R,+)→G, so γ(s+t)=γ(s)γ(t) and γ(0)=e. One-parameter subgroup of a Lie group.

[F3]

Evaluation at e identifies g with the left-invariant smooth fields: X determines the unique field XgL=d(Lg)eX. This result assumes ACω through the smooth tangent-bundle framework. Left-invariant vector fields evaluate isomorphically at the identity.

[F4]

Every left-invariant smooth field is complete, assuming ACω through that same framework. Left-invariant vector fields are complete.

[F5]

A curve c is an integral curve of a field Y precisely when c′(t)=Yc(t). Integral curves of a vector field.

[F6]

Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve. Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve.

[F7]

Differentials of smooth maps obey the chain rule. The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3F5F7algebra

Let γ be a one-parameter subgroup with γ′(0)=X. For fixed t, [F2] gives γ(t+s)=Lγ(t)(γ(s)). Differentiating at s=0 and using [F7] yields γ′(t)=d(Lγ(t))eγ′(0)=d(Lγ(t))eX=Xγ(t)L. Hence γ is an integral curve of XL through e.

1.2F3F4F6construct

Conversely, let XL be the unique field supplied by [F3]. By [F4] and [F6], its maximal integral curve c:R→G with c(0)=e is global. Fix s∈R and define as(t)=c(s+t) and bs(t)=c(s)c(t). Both curves are defined for every real t, and as(0)=bs(0)=c(s).

2.1F3F5F6F7step 1.2algebra

By [F5], as′(t)=Xc(s+t)L=Xas(t)L. The chain rule and left invariance give bs′(t)=d(Lc(s))c(t)c′(t)=d(Lc(s))c(t)Xc(t)L=Xc(s)c(t)L=Xbs(t)L. Thus as and bs are global integral curves through the same point at time zero. Uniqueness in [F6] gives c(s+t)=c(s)c(t) for all s,t∈R.

3.1F2F3F5F6step 1.1step 2.1

The curve c is smooth, global, satisfies c(0)=e and the homomorphism law from step 2.1, so it is a one-parameter subgroup by [F2]; its initial velocity is c′(0)=XeL=X. If γ is any other one-parameter subgroup with initial velocity X, step 1.1 makes it an integral curve of XL through e, and [F6] forces γ=c. This proves existence and uniqueness for every X∈g.

4.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1∎

Lie groups are nonempty and boundaryless. If dim⁡G=0, then X=0 and the unique curve is constant; in dimension one the proof is unchanged. Both time directions are covered because c has domain all of R. No metric or nondegeneracy condition occurs. The only choice assumption is the stated ACω, inherited through [F3] and [F4]; fixing one X and one real s adds no family choice. The two implications in the statement are proved in steps 1.1 and 1.2--3.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources