How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Poles of a meromorphic function form a closed discrete set and are at most countable
Statement
Let be meromorphic on a plane domain , and let be its pole set. Then:
- every has a neighbourhood in containing no other pole, so is discrete in ;
- is open, so is closed in ;
- is at most countable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A meromorphic function on a nonempty connected open set .
By definition, every point of is a pole, and is holomorphic on (Meromorphic functions on a plane domain, Isolated singularities: removable, poles, and essential singularities).
The rationals are countable, the product of two at most countable sets is at most countable, a subset of an at most countable set is at most countable, and every nonempty at most countable set admits a surjection from whose least-hit map gives an injection into ( is countably infinite, A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable, Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable, A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of ).
Between any two real numbers lies a rational (The rationals embed densely in the reals).
Every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
Proof
Fix . By [L1], is a pole, so some radius has contained in and holomorphic on . If and , then lies in a region where is holomorphic, contradicting . Thus contains no pole other than .
Let be the family of discs with and . By [L2], is at most countable, so is at most countable and admits an injection .
Step 1.1 proves that is discrete in . If , then [L1] says is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of , and that neighbourhood contains no point of ; hence is open and is closed in .
For each , step 1.1 gives . Write . By [L3], choose rationals with and , so ; choose a rational with , again by [L3]. Then , so the set of discs in containing and contained in is nonempty.
For each , the set is nonempty by step 2.2, so [L4] gives its least element; call it . If , then injectivity of makes the corresponding discs equal, and that disc lies inside and contains both and , so step 1.1 forces . Therefore is injective from into .
The injection of step 3.1 makes at most countable, completing the proof.
Remarks
The pole set need not be closed in all of when : it may accumulate at boundary points of the domain. The theorem says precisely that no accumulation can happen inside .
Depends on
Isolated singularities: removable, poles, and essential singularities
Meromorphic functions on a plane domain
is countably infinite
A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable
Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable
The rationals embed densely in the reals
The well-ordering principle
A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of