Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local Faddeev–Popov slice Jacobian and orbit-intersection count

Statement

Assume ACω and let (X,K,α,S,χ,μX,μK,μS) be finite-dimensional regulated gauge-slice data as defined above, with dim⁡X=n, dim⁡K=k, 1≤k≤n, and s0∈S∩U. Thus K acts smoothly on the right, S is an embedded codimension-k submanifold, χ:U→Rk is a smooth defining submersion with ker⁡dχs=TsS, and the Faddeev–Popov operator is Ms=dχs∘Rs. Suppose Ms0 is an isomorphism. For Ψ(g,s)=s⋅g, there are neighborhoods V of the identity in K, W of s0 in S, and O of s0 in X such that Ψ:V×W→O is a C1 diffeomorphism. Consequently, each x∈O has exactly one representation x=s⋅g with (g,s)∈V×W. In particular, if s,s′∈W and g∈V satisfy s′=s⋅g, then g=e and s′=s. This local uniqueness does not assert that every orbit in X meets W, or exclude further intersections related by group elements outside V.

Fix group coordinates ξ near the identity, slice coordinates z near s0, and adapted target coordinates (y,z)=(χ,z) near s0. Write the densities there as μK=ρK(ξ)∣dξ∣, μS=ρS(z)∣dz∣, and μX=ρX(y,z)∣dy dz∣. The positive Jacobian JΨ defined by Ψ∗μX=JΨ(μK⊗μS) satisfies

JΨ(e,s0)=ρX(0,z0)ρS(z0) ΔFP(s0),

where ΔFP uses the density (μK)e and the standard density on Rk. Thus, when the target and slice densities are normalized so that ρX(0,z0)=ρS(z0), the ordinary finite-dimensional orbit-to-slice Jacobian is exactly ΔFP(s0). For every compactly supported Riemann-integrable function f:O→R, the local change-of-variables identity is

∫Of dμX=∫V×W(f∘Ψ)JΨ dμK dμS.

For the exact multiplicity statement, fix x∈X and a relatively compact open set Γ⊂K such that x⋅Γ‾⊂U. Let Fx(g)=χ(x⋅g). Let r≥0 be finite, and suppose Fx has exactly r zeros g1,…,gr in the support of a smooth function φ compactly supported in Γ, each Mx⋅gi is invertible, and the slice points si=x⋅gi are distinct. Choose a nonnegative η∈Cc∞(Rk), supported in a ball BC(0) of finite radius C>0, with integral 1, and set ηϵ(y)=ϵ−kη(y/ϵ). Then

lim⁡ϵ↓0∫Γφ(g) ηϵ(Fx(g)) ΔFP(x⋅g) dμK(g)=∑i=1rφ(gi).

In particular, if φ=1 near the zeros, this finite-regulator expression counts the r distinct transverse intersections exactly. The theorem asserts only a local chart and this finite-dimensional multiplicity formula; it gives no global gauge section, functional determinant, or continuum path-integral measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the finite-dimensional regulated slice data, s0, the invertible map Ms0, and, for the multiplicity clause, x,Γ,φ,η and the stated finite zero set.

[A1]

ACω is countable choice: every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The qftx gauge-data chain inherits this assumption; no arbitrary-index choice is added here. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Finite-dimensional gauge slices and Faddeev–Popov operators: the regulator supplies finite-dimensional X, a smooth right K-action, an embedded slice S and a gauge condition χ:U→Rk with U∩S=χ−1(0), the orbit map Rs=d(αs)e, and Ms=dχs∘Rs, with its determinant measured relative to the declared densities.

[F2]

The Euclidean inverse function theorem: for a C1 map between open subsets of equal-dimensional Euclidean spaces, an invertible derivative at a point gives neighborhoods on which the map is a C1 diffeomorphism.

[F3]

A compactly supported Riemann integrand admits the global change-of-variables formula from a diffeomorphism near the relevant compact preimage: an injective C1 map between open subsets of Rm, with invertible derivative throughout, gives the compactly supported Riemann change-of-variables formula with factor ∣det⁡Dg∣.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2algebra

Choose a submanifold chart (z,w) at s0 with S given by w=0. Since ker⁡dχs0=Ts0S and dχs0 is onto, the derivative of χ in the w-directions is an isomorphism. Therefore (z,w)↦(χ(z,w),z) has invertible derivative; [F2] gives adapted target coordinates (y,z)=(χ,z) near s0. This uses the supplied finite-dimensional data [F1] and inherited countable-choice premise [A1].

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra

In source coordinates (ξ,z) on K×S and target coordinates (y,z), DΨ(e,s0) has block matrix (Ms00∗In−k): the upper-left block is dχs0∘Rs0=Ms0, the upper-right block vanishes because χ is zero on S, and the lower-right block is the identity because z is the slice coordinate. Its determinant is nonzero by the hypothesis on Ms0. Applying [F2] gives an open neighborhood on which Ψ is a diffeomorphism; choose an open product V×W inside that neighborhood and set O=Ψ(V×W), which is open because a local diffeomorphism is open. The diffeomorphism gives exactly one pair (g,s)∈V×W for every x∈O. If s′=s⋅g with s,s′∈W and g∈V, both (g,s) and (e,s′) map to s′, so injectivity gives g=e and s=s′. No assertion about other orbits or group elements outside V follows.

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra

In the same coordinates, the block determinant has absolute value ∣det⁡Ms0∣. Dividing by the source density coefficient ρK(ξ(e))ρS(z0) and using ΔFP(s0)=∣det⁡Ms0∣/ρK(ξ(e)) gives JΨ(e,s0)=ρX(0,z0)ΔFP(s0)/ρS(z0). On the chosen chart, [F3] applied to each compactly supported Riemann-integrable target function gives ∫Of dμX=∫V×W(f∘Ψ)JΨ dμK dμS.

4.1F1F2F3step 3.1algebra∎

At g∈K, the left-invariant frame is Z↦d(Lg)eZ, and the right-action identity gives D(Fx)g(d(Lg)eZ)=Mx⋅gZ. The density μK has coefficient ρK(ξ(e)) in this frame, so ΔFP(x⋅g)dμK(g) changes to Lebesgue density under y=Fx(g). Around each of the finitely many roots choose pairwise disjoint relatively compact inverse neighborhoods Vi⊂Γ and smooth cutoffs ψi supported there and equal to 1 near gi. The compactly supported remainder φ(1−∑iψi) has support disjoint from Fx−1(0), because every zero in supp⁡φ is listed and each cutoff is 1 near its root; hence ∣Fx∣ has a positive minimum on that support and the remainder integral vanishes for small ϵ. On each branch, [F3] gives ∫Viφ(g)ψi(g)ηϵ(Fx(g))ΔFP(x⋅g)dμK(g)=∫Fx(Vi)φ(Fx,i−1(y))ψi(Fx,i−1(y))ηϵ(y) dy. For small ϵ, the support of ηϵ is contained in Fx(Vi), and this integral differs from φ(gi) by at most sup⁡∣y∣≤Cϵ∣φ(Fx,i−1(y))ψi(Fx,i−1(y))−φ(gi)∣∫ηϵ(y) dy, which tends to zero by continuity and unit mass. Summing the branch limits and the zero remainder proves the formula and counts the distinct transverse intersections.

Remarks

The diagram records the tangent-space calculation used in step 2.1. The upper arrow is the derivative of the local orbit-to-slice coordinate map; the lower arrow measures only its group-orbit component. The square commutes because dχs vanishes on TsS. The proof above establishes invertibility and the Jacobian independently of the diagram.

k©TsSTsXkRkDª(e;s)prkdÂsMs

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources