How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The quotient action is well defined and makes a module
Statement
Let be a submodule of a left -module. The rule
is independent of the representative and, together with the additive quotient group, makes a left -module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A left -module and a submodule .
Additive cosets satisfy exactly when ( iff , and iff ).
A submodule is closed under scalar multiplication and is an additive subgroup (Submodule of a module).
The additive cosets form a quotient group with the inherited addition (For , the cosets form a group with identity and inverse ).
The module axioms give distributivity, associativity of scalar action, and (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module).
Scalar multiplication preserves additive negatives (In a module, , , and ).
Proof
If , then by [L1]. Thus by [L2, L4, L5], and [L1] gives ; the proposed scalar action is well defined.
The quotient addition is an abelian group operation: it is a quotient-group operation by [L3], and .
For cosets, the module identities in give , , , and .
Steps 1.1--1.3 verify a well-defined scalar action on an abelian group satisfying all module axioms; hence is a left -module.