Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The quotient action is well defined and makes M/N a module

Statement

Let N≤M be a submodule of a left R-module. The rule

r(m+N):=rm+N

is independent of the representative m+N and, together with the additive quotient group, makes M/N a left R-module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A left R-module M and a submodule N≤M.

[L1]

Additive cosets satisfy m+N=m′+N exactly when m′−m∈N (x∈aH iff a−1x∈H, and aH=bH iff a−1b∈H).

[L2]

A submodule is closed under scalar multiplication and is an additive subgroup (Submodule of a module).

[L3]

The additive cosets form a quotient group with the inherited addition (For N⊴G, the cosets form a group with identity N and inverse (gN)−1=g−1N).

[L4]

The module axioms give distributivity, associativity of scalar action, and 1Rm=m (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L4L5given

If m+N=m′+N, then m′−m∈N by [L1]. Thus r(m′−m)=rm′−rm∈N by [L2, L4, L5], and [L1] gives rm+N=rm′+N; the proposed scalar action is well defined.

1.2L3L4given

The quotient addition is an abelian group operation: it is a quotient-group operation by [L3], and (m+N)+(m′+N)=(m+m′)+N=(m′+m)+N=(m′+N)+(m+N).

1.3L4given

For cosets, the module identities in M give r((m+N)+(m′+N))=r(m+m′)+N=(rm+rm′)+N=r(m+N)+r(m′+N), (r+s)(m+N)=r(m+N)+s(m+N), (rs)(m+N)=r(s(m+N)), and 1R(m+N)=m+N.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L4∎

Steps 1.1--1.3 verify a well-defined scalar action on an abelian group satisfying all module axioms; hence M/N is a left R-module.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources