Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Schreier refinement theorem in an abelian category

Statement

Let

0=A0≤A1≤⋯≤Am=X,0=B0≤B1≤⋯≤Bn=X

be finite chains of subobjects in an abelian category. Then they admit refinements whose successive quotient objects can be paired up up to isomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two finite subobject chains displayed in the statement.

[F1]

A refinement is obtained by inserting intermediate subobjects, and two finite chains are equivalent when their nonzero successive quotient objects can be paired up up to isomorphism.

[L1]

Each cell in the refinement grid is governed by the butterfly lemma (Zassenhaus butterfly lemma in an abelian category).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1construct

For 0≤i<m and 0≤j≤n, define Ai,j:=Ai∨(Ai+1∧Bj). Then Ai,0=Ai and Ai,n=Ai+1, while Ai,j≤Ai,j+1 for every j. Concatenating the chains Ai=Ai,0≤Ai,1≤⋯≤Ai,n=Ai+1 over i=0,…,m−1 gives a refinement of the A-chain. Define Bj,i:=Bj∨(Bj+1∧Ai) symmetrically; concatenating those chains refines the B-chain.

2.1L1step 1.1

For every cell (i,j), apply [L1] to the pairs Ai≤Ai+1 and Bj≤Bj+1. It gives a canonical isomorphism Ai,j+1Ai,j≅Bj,i+1Bj,i. So the successive quotients of the two refinements are paired by the same grid.

3.1F1step 2.1∎

Some adjacent terms may coincide, producing zero successive quotients. By [F1], deleting those repetitions leaves equivalent refinements, and the quotient pairing from step 2.1 survives on every nonzero factor. Hence the original two chains admit equivalent refinements.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources