Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure

Statement

The Schubert strata are open cells whose closures are unions of cells with componentwise smaller pivot symbols. They form a finite CW structure on Gr⁡n(FN), and the standard inclusions Gr⁡n(FN)→Gr⁡n(FN+1) are cellular subcomplex inclusions. Their union is the stated CW structure on Gr⁡n(F∞), and each finite-dimensional subcomplex is contained in a finite stage.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F=R or C, 0≤n≤N, and the coordinate flag.

[F1]

A Schubert symbol a has a cell e(a)≅Fd(a) with d(a)=∑i(ai−i) (Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians).

[F2]

A CW structure requires characteristic disks, closure finiteness, and the weak topology (CW complex with closure finiteness and weak topology).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1F1construct

For a symbol a, each plane of e(a) has a unique orthonormal echelon frame (v1,…,vn) with vi∈Fai and positive real aith coordinate: orthonormalize its flag of subspaces of dimensions 1,…,n. Let Hi instead be the closed hemisphere of unit vectors in Fai whose aith coordinate is real and nonnegative, and let D(a) consist of all mutually orthogonal frames with vi∈Hi, allowing zero pivot coordinates. Project to v1∈H1 and put v0=ea1. There is a continuous family of orthogonal (real case) or unitary (complex case) maps ρv carrying v to v0, equal to the identity outside their span and at v=v0: use the plane rotation in the real case and the determinant-one unitary map on their complex two-plane in the complex case. The nonnegative real coordinate ensures v≠−v0, and these maps tend to the identity as v→v0. In particular they fix the common perpendicular of v and v0, rather than v⊥ alone. They act only in Fa1, so preserve Hi and its boundary for i>1. Applying ρv to the remaining vectors trivializes the projection, with fiber D(a2−1,…,an−1) after deleting coordinate a1. Induction, starting with n=0, identifies D(a) with a product of closed balls, hence a closed ball of real dimension d(a) or 2d(a). Its boundary is exactly where at least one pivot coordinate is zero.

2.1F1step 1.1

The span map χa:D(a)→Gr⁡n(FN) restricts on the interior, where every last pivot coordinate is positive, to the pivot-coordinate homeomorphism onto e(a) from [F1]. On the boundary at least one last pivot coordinate is zero; echelon reduction then lowers at least one pivot and never increases another. Hence χa(∂D(a)) lies in the union of cells e(b) with bi≤ai for all i and b≠a, all of smaller dimension.

3.1F2step 2.1construct

Induct on the real cell dimension. The zero-dimensional cells form a finite discrete CW complex. If the union Xr of cells of dimension at most r has the asserted CW structure, attach the finitely many disks D(a) of dimension r+1 by the boundary maps in step 2.1. The resulting finite CW complex maps continuously and bijectively to the union Xr+1. Its source is compact, while the Grassmannian is Hausdorff because distinct planes are separated by a squared projection-length function; therefore the map is a homeomorphism. This completes the dimension induction and proves the finite CW structure and closure order.

4.1F1F2step 3.1∎

Under the coordinate inclusion FN⊆FN+1, the cells with an≤N retain the same symbols and characteristic disks, so they form a subcomplex. The stable Grassmannian has the weak topology with respect to these stages; hence [F2] identifies their union as the asserted CW complex. If a subcomplex has dimension at most r, then [F1] gives ai−i≤d(a)≤r, hence ai≤i+r for every symbol it uses. Only finitely many such symbols exist and all have an≤n+r, so the subcomplex lies in the finite stage Gr⁡n(Fn+r).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources