How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Semisimple Lie algebras decompose into simple ideals
Statement
Every finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebra over a characteristic-zero field is a finite direct sum of simple ideals.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional semisimple characteristic-zero Lie algebra .
Its Killing form is nondegenerate (Cartan's semisimplicity criterion).
Orthogonal complements of ideals under are ideals (Orthogonal complements under invariant forms are ideals).
Simple means nonabelian with no nontrivial ideals, and semisimple means zero radical (Simple, semisimple, and reductive Lie algebras).
Proof
The assertion for is the empty direct sum. For nonzero , if is any ideal, then is abelian. Indeed, for in that intersection and , invariance gives , because . By [L1], . Semisimplicity makes this abelian ideal zero.
If , choose a nonzero ideal of least positive dimension; finite dimension makes this a choice from a finite set of integers. By step 1.1 and dimension, . Both summands are ideals, and their bracket lies in their intersection, hence is zero.
The minimal ideal is not abelian, because a nonzero abelian ideal is solvable. If , then and , so is an ideal of ; minimality gives . Thus is simple. Assume inductively that every semisimple algebra of smaller dimension has the asserted decomposition.
The complement is semisimple: any solvable ideal in it is, because the two summands commute, also a solvable ideal of , and hence zero. Its dimension is smaller, so the induction hypothesis in step 3.1 decomposes it into finitely many simple ideals. Adjoining proves the result; a simple is the one-summand case.