How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sharp five lemma in an abelian category
Statement
In a commutative diagram with exact rows
the following hold:
- if is epic and are monic, then is monic;
- if are epic and is monic, then is epic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The commutative exact-row diagram in the statement.
The four lemma gives the monic and epic conclusions on any four-column window with exact rows (Four lemma in an abelian category).
Proof
For the monic clause, apply [L1] to the left four columns The hypotheses there are exactly that is epic and that and are monic, so the four lemma gives that is monic.
For the epic clause, apply [L1] to the right four columns The hypotheses there are exactly that and are epic and that is monic, so the four lemma gives that is epic.
Therefore the sharp five lemma holds in both halves.