Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Short exact two open cover small singular chain sequence

Statement

Let X=U∪V with U,V open. Let C∙U,V(X;R) be the span of simplices whose image lies in U or V. There is a short exact sequence of real chain complexes 0⟶C∙(U∩V;R)→iC∙(U;R)⊕C∙(V;R)→jC∙U,V(X;R)⟶0, where i(c)=(−c,c) and j(a,b)=a+b. This choice of i is the negative of the ordinary AT convention.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The ordered open cover (U,V) of X; all chains have real coefficients.

[F1]

Chains use a supplied basis of simplices and the signed face differential (Real singular chain complex).

[F2]

The ordinary coefficient-chain sequence uses i(c)=(c,−c) and j(a,b)=a+b (Short exact chain Mayer–Vietoris sequence).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

Regard chains in U, V, and U∩V as chains in X by their basis inclusions: a map with image in a subspace has a unique corestriction, continuous by the subspace topology. A face of a small simplex remains small. Hence these spaces and the span CU,V are subcomplexes, and both displayed arrows commute with boundary. The sign choice equals [F2] precomposed by −id⁡ on the overlap.

2.1F1step 1.1

The map i is injective since its second component is c. To split a finite small chain, assign a simplex to the U component whenever its image lies in U, and otherwise to V. This formula gives a preimage under j, proving surjectivity without choosing from an arbitrary family.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

If a+b=0, coefficient comparison in the supplied X basis forces coefficients of a outside the overlap to vanish, and likewise for b. Thus b=−a is an overlap chain, and (a,b)=i(b). Conversely ji(c)=−c+c=0. These prove equality of kernel and image. If an open set or overlap is empty the same argument gives the appropriate zero term; when U=V=X it is the diagonal signed sequence. In negative degrees all terms are zero, and degree zero uses the same basis argument with zero differential. Constant simplices remain generators, and no AC is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources