How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds
Statement
Let be a smooth map and let . If is an isomorphism, then there are open neighbourhoods of and of such that is a diffeomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map and a point with an isomorphism.
The differential of a smooth map is the induced linear map on tangent spaces (The differential of a smooth map).
Differentials satisfy the chain rule (The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps).
In dimension , a Euclidean map with invertible derivative at a point has a local inverse (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
If the original Euclidean map is smooth, then its local inverse is smooth (A local inverse of a regular map is ).
Chart maps and their inverses are smooth diffeomorphisms onto open Euclidean sets (Chart maps are diffeomorphisms onto Euclidean open sets).
The tangent space of a smooth -manifold has dimension , including (The tangent space of an n-manifold has dimension n).
A smooth map is continuous and has smooth coordinate representatives on compatible chart neighbourhoods; maps on open subsets of are declared smooth ( and smooth maps between smooth manifolds).
Proof
By [L5], the isomorphism implies that and have the same dimension . If , smooth charts at and have nonempty open images in the singleton , so their domains are the open singletons and . The restriction is bijective, and its inverse has the unique map as its coordinate representative, which is smooth by [L6]. Thus the conclusion holds when . For the remainder assume .
Choose smooth charts at and at with , as permitted by smoothness in [L6], and let . By [L4], the chart maps and are diffeomorphisms, so their differentials are linear isomorphisms. Applying [L1] gives Because is an isomorphism by [F1], the Euclidean differential is invertible.
Since , [L2] applies: after shrinking to open neighbourhoods and of and , the restriction is a bijection with inverse. Since is smooth, [L3] upgrades that inverse to a smooth one.
Put and . Then , so is bijective. Its inverse is , which is smooth by [L4] and step 2.1.
Thus is a bijective smooth map with smooth inverse, hence a diffeomorphism of neighbourhoods.