How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Calibration of an arbitrary family of simple-system entropies
Statement
Let be a nonempty set of primitive simple-system labels containing a distinguished meter label . Assume every finite separated product is explicitly represented by its finitely many tagged elementary factors; positive scaling and finite product are the only identifications. Suppose the join-closed family satisfies the hypotheses of Contact calibrators under explicit join coherence, and fix a strict meter pair in . Assume the Axiom of Choice. Then one can choose, for every , an additive constant and positive scale for its same-type entropy so that
is additive, extensive, and characterizes every same-composition comparison on every finite separated product. No conclusion is asserted for transitions that change composition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The explicit finite-factor family, common contact branch, strict meter pair, and Axiom of Choice.
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets admits a choice function; it selects the reference states, entropy representatives, and calibrator data used below.
Contact calibrators under explicit join coherence: for each pair of simple types in the join-closed family, strict calibrator endpoints exist and their reversible pair relation identifies the two reference increments in signed comparison.
Additive extensive representation of compound comparison: once a type and its scaled products have CH, a finite real additive extensive entropy represents their equal-mass comparisons.
Signed comparison for forward-sector relations and Spectator cancellation without comparison completeness: signed comparison is translation-invariant and additive, agrees with ordinary comparison on nonnegative equal-mass maps, and permits common-spectator cancellation.
Proof
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3].
Use the positive type normalization in Forward-sector hypotheses for a simple state domain whenever invoking [F2]; state entropies evaluate represented maps , and their unit-label entropy density is . Apply [F2] to the meter type and choose its entropy so and . Set the meter reference to , and use [A1] to choose a reference state and one same-type entropy representative for every . For each , use [F1] to choose calibrator states and such that , , and ; also choose . For the meter label set and ; the two pairs and are the same two-copy meter compound up to permutation. Write for the selected entropy representative, with , and put and . Define . Then and , matching the meter entropy increment across the chosen calibrator endpoints. For , , so this agrees with the fixed meter normalization.
For a finite separated compound with factors , define . The sum is finite and invariant under reordering; concatenating compounds adds the sums, and scaling every amount by multiplies it by . The explicit-factor convention in the Statement therefore makes well-defined, additive, and extensive.
Fix a composition with amounts for finitely many labels and let be two states of that same composition. For a state of type , put The same-type entropy representation and the CH for type show Indeed, the signed difference has total coefficient zero and -value zero, so its positive and negative parts have equal mass and entropy and therefore compare both ways by [F2]. The calibrator relation gives by taking the signed difference of and canceling common terms with [F3]. Add and scale these identities over the finitely many factors of . With the resulting signed map is where the sums range over the finite support of the composition. The same holds for . Since they have the same composition, the reference base cancels, and is signed-equivalent to the finite meter map Extend the meter entropy linearly to raw finite signed coefficient maps using density at a meter raw tag ; in particular its value on is . Then The positive and negative parts of have equal mass. If , the same-type entropy representation [F2] for finite meter products gives , hence compares in the forward signed direction. Translation, addition, and ordinary-order compatibility [F3] transfer this to . Conversely, if , the same signed equivalences and translation in [F3] give . The meter representation in [F2] then forces . Reversing the entropy inequality gives the reverse comparison. Thus characterizes every same-composition comparison. Each particular comparison uses only finitely many labels; no infinite sum or uncountable product occurs.
The meter normalization fixes the multiplicative unit. Changing the chosen reference state for type changes only its additive constant; on a finite compound these constants contribute amount-weighted conserved-type offsets. This proves the stated freedom and completes the construction.
Remarks
AC is used only for simultaneous reference-state, entropy-representative, and calibrator choices over the arbitrary label set . Cross-composition monotonicity requires the additional cost and offset hypotheses developed later.
Depends on
Forward-sector hypotheses for a simple state domain
Thermal joins and conditional contact hypotheses
The Axiom of Choice
Contact calibrators under explicit join coherence
Additive extensive representation of compound comparison
Signed comparison for forward-sector relations
Spectator cancellation without comparison completeness