Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tempered convolution is smooth with polynomial growth

Statement

For u∈S′(Rn) and φ∈S(Rn), the function u∗φ is smooth and every derivative has polynomial growth. For each multi-index γ,

∂γ(u∗φ)=(∂γu)∗φ=u∗(∂γφ).

Consequently u∗φ, interpreted as a regular distribution, belongs to S′(Rn).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: u∈S′ and φ∈S, with convolution as in Convolution of a tempered distribution with a schwartz function.

[F1]

There are C,N,M giving a finite rectangular seminorm estimate for u (Finite seminorm bound characterizes tempered distributions).

[F2]

Translation, reflection, and differentiation are continuous on Schwartz space (Basic operations are continuous on Schwartz space).

[F3]

Smooth pointwise-polynomial-growth functions define regular tempered distributions (Polynomial growth functions define tempered distributions).

Proof

technique · differentiate translated tests in Schwartz seminorms
1.1F1F2given

For every x and coordinate j, Taylor's integral remainder and 1+∣y∣≤(1+∣x∣)(1+∣x−y∣) show that the xj-difference quotients of y↦φ(x−y) converge in every Schwartz seminorm to y↦∂jφ(x−y). Continuity of u permits differentiation of the scalar pairing, and iteration gives every multi-index derivative.

∂γ(u∗φ)(x)=⟨uy,∂γφ(x−y)⟩.

[F1, F2, given]

1.2F2

Apply the definition of distributional differentiation to the translated test.

⟨∂γuy,φ(x−y)⟩=(−1)∣γ∣⟨uy,∂yγφ(x−y)⟩=⟨uy,∂γφ(x−y)⟩.

Together with step 1.1 this proves both derivative identities, including γ=0. [F2, step 1.1]

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Apply [F1] to the translated test in step 1.1. Write z=x−y and expand yα=(x−z)α.

sup⁡y∣yα∂yβ∂γφ(x−y)∣≤Cφ,N,M,γ(1+∣x∣)N.

Hence ∣∂γ(u∗φ)(x)∣≤Cγ(1+∣x∣)N. [F1, algebra]

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1∎

Step 1.1 gives smoothness, and step 2.1 gives pointwise polynomial growth for every derivative. In particular the function is locally integrable and [F3] makes its regular distribution tempered. If u=0 or φ=0, all formulas reduce to zero. No parameter integral or choice axiom is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources