How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let be any family of -modules, and let be an -module. The homomorphism induced by the coordinate inclusions is a natural -module isomorphism
The same holds with the direct sum in the second variable: there is a natural -module isomorphism
The assertion includes , when both sides are zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a family of -modules, and an -module .
Balanced pairings induce unique homomorphisms from tensor products (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).
Tensor products over a commutative ring carry their canonical -module structure (Over a commutative ring, is an -module with ).
The direct sum consists of finite-support tuples, with coordinate inclusions , and the empty direct sum is zero (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).
Every family of homomorphisms extends uniquely to a homomorphism whose value is the finite sum of the coordinate values (Universal property of a direct sum of modules).
Over a commutative ring there is a natural isomorphism with , and is the identity (Symmetry and associativity isomorphisms for tensor products over a commutative ring).
Proof
For each , the pairing is bilinear, so [L1] gives . By [L4], the family induces the displayed map .
Define by . This tuple has finite support by [L3], and coordinatewise calculation shows that is bilinear.
By [L1], the pairing in step 1.2 induces with .
The composite fixes every coordinate generator , so it is the identity by [L4]; the composite fixes every elementary tensor , so it is the identity by [L1].
Thus and are inverse isomorphisms. They are natural because maps and make the two composites send each coordinate generator to . When , [L3] makes both sides zero and the same construction yields the unique isomorphism.
For the second variable, put , where the middle direct sum of the symmetries is the map induced by [L4] from the family . Each is an isomorphism by [L5] and is one by step 4.1, so is an isomorphism; it is natural as a composite of natural isomorphisms. Tracing a coordinate generator gives , which is the displayed formula. At both sides are again zero.