Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The koszul formula defines an affine connection

Statement

For any supplied smooth Riemannian metric, its Koszul expression K determines a unique smooth affine connection by ∇XY=(12K(X,Y,⋅))♯. This construction works on manifolds with boundary and requires no AC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth positive-definite metric g; K denotes the six-term expression, without assuming a connection exists.

[F1]

The Koszul expression is the displayed metric-and-bracket formula (Koszul formula is necessary for a levi civita connection). Only its formula is used here, not that lemma's hypothesis of an existing Levi–Civita connection.

[F2]

Musical maps are smooth inverse bundle isomorphisms (The musical maps are smooth inverse bundle isomorphisms).

[F3]

Bracket function-multiple identities hold (Leibniz rules for the Lie bracket with function multiples).

[F4]

The three directional connection laws determine an intrinsic connection (Connection laws in directional form).

Proof

1.1F1F3

Expand K(X,Y,fZ) using the scalar product rule and [F3]. The derivative-of-f terms, in the order of the six summands, are (Xf)g(Y,Z), (Yf)g(Z,X), 0, −(Yf)g(X,Z), −(Xf)g(Y,Z), 0. They cancel by symmetry of g, so K(X,Y,fZ)=fK(X,Y,Z). Real linearity and additivity in all three fields follow termwise.

1.2F1F3

In K(fX,Y,Z) the additional terms are 0, (Yf)g(Z,X), −(Zf)g(X,Y), 0, (Zf)g(Y,X), −(Yf)g(Z,X), and hence cancel. Thus K(fX,Y,Z)=fK(X,Y,Z). For K(X,fY,Z) the additional terms are (Xf)g(Y,Z), 0, −(Zf)g(X,Y), (Zf)g(X,Y), 0, (Xf)g(Z,Y). Their sum is 2(Xf)g(Y,Z), proving K(X,fY,Z)=fK(X,Y,Z)+2(Xf)g(Y,Z).

2.1F2step 1.1

For fixed local X,Y, expand Z=∑iZi∂i. Step 1.1 gives K(X,Y,Z)=∑iZiK(X,Y,∂i), so K(X,Y,⋅)/2 is a smooth one-form with those smooth coordinate coefficients. The intrinsic six-term expression shows agreement on overlaps. Apply the smooth map ♯ to get the displayed smooth vector field. Nondegeneracy makes it the unique field with 2g(∇XY,Z)=K(X,Y,Z) for every Z.

3.1F2F4step 1.2step 2.1∎

Step 1.2 and real linearity give function-linearity in X, real linearity in Y, and ∇X(fY)=f∇XY+(Xf)Y, since g(Y,⋅)♯=Y. Thus [F4] gives an affine connection. The local formulas agree on restrictions, so they define a global operator without choosing an initial connection. Rank zero and empty base give the unique zero maps; in dimension one the same scalar identities apply. Smooth up-to-boundary functions have the same product and bracket rules in half-space charts, so the argument includes boundary points. Every construction is uniquely determined by the given metric; no AC or partition of unity enters.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources