Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact topological manifold boundaries admit collars

Statement

If M is a compact topological manifold with boundary A=∂M, there is an open neighborhood V of A and a homeomorphism c:A×[0,1)→∼V,c(x,0)=x. Consequently A↪M is an unbased cofibration, and M∖A↪M is a homotopy equivalence. The manifold is Hausdorff and second countable by convention. All three conclusions require no AC.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

Given: The compact manifold M. Write A=∂M. If A=∅, take V=∅, the empty collar, the identity as the interior equivalence, and extend any compatible initial map f:M→Z by H(y,t)=f(y). Hence assume A≠∅ and n≥1.

1.1F1F2given

The interior is open by [F1]: in a chart an interior point has a smaller Euclidean ball missing the model boundary. Thus A is closed and compact. Restricting each boundary chart to the model hyperplane gives charts for the Hausdorff second-countable boundary A, of dimension n−1 and without boundary. We can take the ambient boundary charts Wi homeomorphic to all of Rn−1×[0,∞). Indeed a product Brn−1×[0,r) inside an original chart can be sent there by the horizontal map y↦y/(r−∥y∥) and vertical map v↦v/(r−v); their inverses are z↦rz/(1+∥z∥) and t↦rt/(1+t).

2.1F4step 1.1

Attach an external collar by defining M′=(M⊔(A×[0,1]))/((x,0)∼x). The original M and the external collar embed with their usual topologies. For example an open set O⊂M extends to the quotient-open set consisting of O and (O∩A)×[0,ϵ) for 0<ϵ≤1; positive external heights have their ordinary product neighborhoods. These descriptions also prove that M′ is Hausdorff. Two points in M can use disjoint open neighborhoods extended in this way; two external points have separated base or height neighborhoods; to separate an external point of height t>0 from a point in M, use a collar cutoff ϵ<t for the latter and an external neighborhood above ϵ for the former. Compatibility at height zero is exactly the quotient topology in [F4]. Each half-space chart from step 1.1, joined to its external part, therefore has signed coordinates (x,s) with s≤0 inside M and 0≤s≤1 outside, the two copies at zero identified. The map across zero and its inverse are continuous by finite closed pasting and [F4].

2.2F1F2step 1.1

There are finitely many continuous functions bi:A→[0,1] whose positive sets cover A and whose supports are compact subsets of A∩Wi. To construct them, in any boundary chart take the radial function max⁡(0,1−∥y−y0∥/r) with its closed radius-r ball contained in that chart, and extend it by zero on the rest of A. Its support is compact by [F2], hence closed, and is contained in the chart; at a point off that compact support an open neighborhood has function identically zero, proving continuity of the extension. The positive sets of all such functions cover A, so compactness gives a finite subcover and hence finitely many functions. For n=1, boundary charts are singletons and use the constant value-one function there, extended by zero. Set φi=bi/(∑jbj). The denominator is positive everywhere, so these are continuous, have the same compact supports and sum to 1.

3.1F3F4step 2.1step 2.2

Put ψk=φ1+⋯+φk, ψ0=0, and let Mk⊂M′ consist of M and the external points (x,t) with 0≤t≤ψk(x). Thus M0=M and Mm=M′ for the finite number m of functions. In the signed coordinates for Wk take its inner collar with −1≤s≤0. Define hk:Mk−1→Mk to be identity outside this collar and the external segments over A∩Wk, and on their part with −1≤s≤ψk−1(x) set hk(x,s)=(x,−1+(s+1)1+ψk(x)1+ψk−1(x)). The denominator is at least one. This increasing affine map sends the bottom −1 to −1 and the old top ψk−1(x) to the new top ψk(x). If φk(x)=0 it is the identity on the entire segment.

4.1F2F3F4step 3.1

The formula in step 3.1 defines a homeomorphism globally. In its signed-coordinate region it is continuous, including across zero; along the bottom it agrees with the identity on the region below. All points where it can differ from identity lie over the compact base support of φk. The product of that support with [−1,1] is compact by [F3], and its embedded image in the Hausdorff M′ is closed by [F2]. Away from this set the map is identity; at a point of the set all local pasting is within the signed-coordinate chart. Thus there is no continuity issue at the edge of the chart. The inverse has the same support and the formula hk−1(x,s′)=(x,−1+(s′+1)1+ψk−1(x)1+ψk(x)), again continuous and fixing the bottom. Direct substitution proves both composites identities, and the increasing interval bijections plus the fixed complement prove bijectivity on the indicated Mk.

5.1F4step 3.1step 4.1

The finite composite h=hm⋯h1:M→M′ is a homeomorphism. For x∈A, the successive maps take the graph point (x,ψk−1(x)) to (x,ψk(x)), even when that stage's function is zero. Hence h(x)=(x,1). The external region A×(0,1] is open in M′: its preimage under the quotient has empty intersection with M and is open in A×[0,1]. Therefore c(x,t)=h−1(x,1−t)(0≤t<1) is the required homeomorphism onto its open image V, and c(x,0)=x.

6.1F2F3step 5.1

Fix b=1/2. Within c(A×[0,b]) define a homotopy by c(x,v)↦c(x,v+s(b−v)/2) for s∈[0,1], and use identity outside c(A×[0,b)). The formulas agree at v=b and are continuous by finite closed pasting: the first collar segment is compact by [F3], hence closed by [F2], and the complementary piece is closed because c(A×[0,b)) is open. At s=0 this is identity, and at s=1 it sends every boundary point to positive height while preserving the interior throughout. Its terminal map r:M→M∖A is continuous into that subspace. The homotopy gives ir≃1M, and its restriction to the interior gives ri≃1M∖A, where i is the inclusion. Thus i is a homotopy equivalence.

6.2F2F3step 5.1construct

For HEP put b=1/2 again and retract M×I onto T=M×{0}∪A×I. Outside c(A×[0,b)) send (y,t) to (y,0). At y=c(x,v), 0≤v<b, put a(v)=v/(b−v). If t≤a(v), send it to (c(x,b(a(v)−t)1+a(v)−t),0); if t≥a(v), send it to (x,t−a(v))∈A×I. At equality both give (x,0). At v=0 it is (x,t), and at t=0 its first branch gives (c(x,v),0). As v approaches b from below, a(v) tends to infinity, uniformly dominating t∈[0,1], and the new collar height tends to b; hence the formula extends continuously to the outside rule. The collar extends beyond b, so this limiting continuity is checked within its actual coordinate chart. These local formulas define a continuous map into the subspace T, fixing T pointwise. To verify the unbased cofibration assertion directly, let Z be any topological space, let f:M→Z and g:A×I→Z be continuous, and suppose g(x,0)=f(x) for every x∈A. Paste f on M×{0} and g on A×I, the two closed pieces of T, and compose with the retraction. Finite closed pasting proves a continuous H:M×I→Z satisfying H(y,0)=f(y) and H(x,t)=g(x,t) for all x∈A. This is the unbased homotopy extension property for every target Z, without appealing to a later definition.

7.1F1F2F3F4step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 6.2∎

Steps 5.1, 6.1 and 6.2 prove all assertions. Empty boundary, empty M and dimension zero were settled in the Given paragraph; a compact zero-manifold has no boundary. One half-chart and zero individual bump functions cause no difficulty, since denominators in step 3.1 remain at least one and a zero increment is identity. The geometric endpoints s=−1, external height 1, collar height b, and HEP times 0,1 were checked explicitly. No chain or simplex convention is involved in this topological theorem. All covers are the families of every available chart bump, thinned only once to a finite subcover; all subsequent choices are finite and all maps have displayed formulas. No AC is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources