Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Weierstrass M-test gives absolute pointwise convergence and uniform convergence of a function series

Statement

Let X be a set and let fk:X→R. Suppose there is a sequence of nonnegative reals (Mk) such that

∣fk(x)∣≤Mk(k∈N, x∈X)

and the scalar series ∑Mk converges. Then ∑fk(x) converges absolutely for every x∈X, and the function series ∑fk converges uniformly on X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Functions fk:X→R and nonnegative reals Mk with ∣fk(x)∣≤Mk for all k,x, such that ∑Mk converges.

[L2]

A convergent real series has uniformly small scalar tails: for every real ε>0 there is N such that ∣∑k=m+1nak∣<ε whenever n>m≥N (A series converges iff for every ε>0 there is N with ∣am+1+⋯+an∣<ε for all n>m≥N).

[L3]

Repeated triangle inequalities for finite sums give ∣∑k=pquk∣≤∑k=pq∣uk∣, and finite sums preserve termwise inequalities (The triangle inequality, Basic properties of the absolute value, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1

Fix x∈X. Since 0≤∣fk(x)∣≤Mk for every k, [L1] shows that ∑∣fk(x)∣ converges.

1.2L2choose

Let ε>0. By [L2] choose N such that ∑k=m+1nMk<ε whenever n>m≥N, the absolute value being unnecessary because the terms are nonnegative.

2.1step 1.2L3

For n>m≥N and x∈X, one has ∣∑k=m+1nfk(x)∣≤∑k=m+1n∣fk(x)∣≤∑k=m+1nMk<ε.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L4∎

Step 1.1 gives absolute pointwise convergence, while step 2.1 and [L4] give uniform convergence of ∑fk.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources