How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weyl's lemma for the Laplacian
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice .
If and , there is a unique smooth harmonic with .
Proof
Given: Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) and on the open set .
The distributional Laplacian commutes with local mollification makes smooth and harmonic on [given].
Each is harmonic by step 1.1, so the ball and spherical mean-value properties apply under Countable Choice. Radial mollification therefore fixes it: on , and likewise . Associativity of distributional convolution with these compactly supported test kernels identifies the two double convolutions on that common shrunken domain. Hence there.
On each compact subset of , all sufficiently small regularizations agree by step 2.1; their common value defines a smooth harmonic . For a test function supported in that compact subset, : the mollified tests converge to with all derivatives on one fixed compact support, so distributional continuity applies. Since on the support for small , this gives .
If , then almost everywhere; continuity makes everywhere [given]. ∎