How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Zero loci in affine space are the closed sets of the classical Zariski topology
Statement
Let be an algebraically closed field and fix . The subsets form the closed sets of a topology on . More precisely:
- arbitrary intersections of sets of the form are again of that form;
- finite unions of sets of the form are again of that form;
- and are of that form.
For ideals one has
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed field and an integer .
For any subsets , the zero locus is the set of points where every polynomial in vanishes (An affine algebraic set in affine space).
Replacing a set of equations by the ideal it generates does not change the zero locus (A zero locus depends only on the generated ideal and its radical).
Proof
If is any family of subsets of , then a point lies in every exactly when it annihilates every polynomial in every , that is, exactly when it lies in . Hence
By definition, and .
Let be ideals. If , then every product with and vanishes at , so . Conversely, if but and , choose and with and . Then , contradicting . Thus .
For arbitrary subsets , step 1.3 and [L2] give so finite unions of zero loci are zero loci. Repeating this argument proves the same for any finite union.
Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 2.1 are exactly the topology axioms for the closed subsets of , and step 1.3 gives the displayed formula .