How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The dihedral product complement admits no finite CW model
Statement
The space of Independent meridian classes detected by individual winding maps is not homotopy equivalent to a finite CW complex. A finite CW complex is a space obtained by attaching finitely many cells in finitely many dimensions. A finite CW model for means such a complex homotopy equivalent to .
Statement references
External input
Hatcher, §2.2, Theorem 2.35 (p.139) identifies cellular with singular homology; consequence (ii) (p.140) bounds the generators of by the finite number of one-cells of a CW complex . Corollary 2.11 (p.111) gives homology isomorphisms under homotopy equivalence. These are imported premises, with integer coefficients.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The infinite independent family in from Independent meridian classes detected by individual winding maps. Goal: Obstruct finite CW homotopy type, rather than merely count cells in one chosen model.
The cellular-homology bound and homotopy-invariance consequence in the External input section are imported from Hatcher at the cited locators.
CW complexes have the cell-attachment, closure-finiteness and weak-topology structure of CW complex with closure finiteness and weak topology. Homotopy equivalence has the meaning of Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type. Finiteness means finitely many cells in total.
Proof
If is a finite CW complex, let be its number of one-cells. By [F2], is generated by at most elements. A homotopy equivalence would give an isomorphism , making the latter generated by at most elements.
We prove by induction on that any vectors in have a nonzero integral relation. For , gives one. For , write for the first coordinate of . If all vanish, apply the induction hypothesis to the last coordinates of and give coefficient zero. Otherwise reorder so . For , the vectors have zero first coordinate. Their last coordinates admit an integral relation with some , by induction. Thus is a nonzero integral relation, since at least one coefficient is nonzero.
Let an abelian group be generated by and let . Write each as with integers , and let . Step 1.2 gives integers , not all zero, with . Substituting the expressions for gives . Hence a group generated by elements contains no independent family of elements; the argument includes .
If a finite CW complex were homotopy equivalent to , step 1.1 would make generated by some finite number of elements. Choose the meridian classes indexed by from [F1]. Their integral independence contradicts step 2.1. Therefore has no finite CW model.
Depends on
- Independent meridian classes detected by individual winding maps
- CW complex with closure finiteness and weak topology
- Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology · §2.1, Corollary 2.11, printed p.111; §2.2, Theorem 2.35, p.139, and consequence (ii), p.140 (PDF pages 120, 148–149)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Cellular homology agrees with integral singular homology. A CW complex with k one-cells has H_1 generated by at most k elements. Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on integral singular homology.
Hypotheses: CW complex for cellular homology and the cell-count bound, with k finite here; a continuous homotopy equivalence between topological spaces for the homology isomorphism. Integer coefficients throughout; no connectedness hypothesis is required.
Reading limits: During this repair, read the online PDF text of Corollary 2.11 and its preceding functoriality and homotopy-invariance statements on printed p.111, and the cellular-homology definition, Theorem 2.35 and consequence (ii) on pp.139–140. Checked the statements and their applicability; did not reconstruct the general cellular-homology or homotopy-invariance proofs or read the complete book.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology · §2.1, Corollary 2.11, printed p.111; §2.2, Theorem 2.35, p.139, and consequence (ii), p.140 (PDF pages 120, 148–149)