How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Antipodal generic points in a central relative ball
Statement
Let and let be a relative ball supplied by the central-relative-ball lemma. One can choose lying on no hyperplane of with . If , they can be chosen distinct, and lies in the relative interior of their segment . Here the relative interior of this nondegenerate segment means . If , take ; the relative arrangement is empty.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The space is a finite-dimensional real vector space with the induced coordinate Euclidean norm. Each member of is a proper linear hyperplane for a nonzero linear functional , by Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements.
The fixed ball has , lies in , and meets only finitely many relative hyperplanes; each such hyperplane contains , by Shrink the finite relative ball to a central arrangement.
A finite family of proper linear subspaces cannot cover a finite-dimensional vector space over an infinite field, by A finite-dimensional vector space over an infinite field is not a finite union of proper subspaces.
Proof
Given: The relative space and arrangement in [F1], the central finite relative ball in [F2], and finite-union avoidance in [F3]. Goal: Construct the antipodal pair, with the stated relative segment interior in positive dimension and the stated zero-dimensional case.
Proof technique: direct.
If , then , and there are no proper linear hyperplanes in , so is empty and has the required properties. Suppose . By [F2], the relative hyperplanes meeting the ball form a finite set and all contain ; by [F1], they are proper linear subspaces of . Since is infinite, [F3] supplies . If is nonempty, this is nonzero because every contains ; if is empty, choose any nonzero .
Choose with and put , , so both points lie in . For , [F1] gives a nonzero linear functional , [F2] gives , and step 1.1 gives . Thus and are nonzero. No other relative hyperplane meets the ball, by the definition of , so neither point lies on any relative hyperplane. Also and . The segment parametrization in the Statement therefore gives with , placing in its stated relative interior.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.