Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite pair separation yields a finite relative ball

Statement

Let E=ΘJ, T=Cone(J) and u∈T∘. There is r>0 with BE(u,r)⊆T meeting only finitely many distinct hyperplanes in HJ.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The space E=ΘJ has the metric dE induced by the coordinate Euclidean metric on Θ; BE(u,r)={x∈E:dE(x,u)<r}, and relative interior is computed using these balls. Annihilators, relative hyperplanes and complexification

[F2]

Given: The relative arrangement in Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements, finite strict separation of every pair of Tits-cone points in Only finitely many hyperplanes separate two Tits-cone points, and the two coordinate-vertex lemmas Coordinate vertices inside a relative open ball and A hyperplane near the centre separates opposite coordinate vertices. Goal: Establish a finite relative ball without ambient local finiteness.

Proof

Given: The relative arrangement in Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements, finite strict separation of every pair of Tits-cone points in Only finitely many hyperplanes separate two Tits-cone points, and the two coordinate-vertex lemmas Coordinate vertices inside a relative open ball and A hyperplane near the centre separates opposite coordinate vertices. Goal: Establish a finite relative ball without ambient local finiteness.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1F1F2given

If E=0, it has no proper hyperplanes, so the assertion is immediate. Otherwise put d=dim⁡E>0, choose vertices and ε by Coordinate vertices inside a relative open ball and set r=ε/d. All vertices lie in T⊆Cone. For each of the finitely many pairs (pi+,pi−) the ambient root hyperplanes strictly separating that pair form a finite set by Only finitely many hyperplanes separate two Tits-cone points. Let F be their finite union.

2.1step 1.1F1F2given∎

Every proper trace K=H∩E∈HJ meeting BE(u,r) strictly separates one such pair by A hyperplane near the centre separates opposite coordinate vertices. Restricted evaluation and ambient evaluation agree on E, so its representative ambient hyperplane H belongs to F. Hence all these K belong to the finite set {H∩E:H∈F}. Also 0<r=ε/d≤ε, so BE(u,r)⊆BE(u,ε)⊆T by [F1] and the choice of ε. This proves the assertion, counting coincident traces once.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.