How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite pair separation yields a finite relative ball
Statement
Let , and . There is with meeting only finitely many distinct hyperplanes in .
Facts & Assumptions
The space has the metric induced by the coordinate Euclidean metric on ; , and relative interior is computed using these balls. Annihilators, relative hyperplanes and complexification
Given: The relative arrangement in Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements, finite strict separation of every pair of Tits-cone points in Only finitely many hyperplanes separate two Tits-cone points, and the two coordinate-vertex lemmas Coordinate vertices inside a relative open ball and A hyperplane near the centre separates opposite coordinate vertices. Goal: Establish a finite relative ball without ambient local finiteness.
Proof
Given: The relative arrangement in Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements, finite strict separation of every pair of Tits-cone points in Only finitely many hyperplanes separate two Tits-cone points, and the two coordinate-vertex lemmas Coordinate vertices inside a relative open ball and A hyperplane near the centre separates opposite coordinate vertices. Goal: Establish a finite relative ball without ambient local finiteness.
Proof technique: direct.
If , it has no proper hyperplanes, so the assertion is immediate. Otherwise put , choose vertices and by Coordinate vertices inside a relative open ball and set . All vertices lie in . For each of the finitely many pairs the ambient root hyperplanes strictly separating that pair form a finite set by Only finitely many hyperplanes separate two Tits-cone points. Let be their finite union.
Every proper trace meeting strictly separates one such pair by A hyperplane near the centre separates opposite coordinate vertices. Restricted evaluation and ambient evaluation agree on , so its representative ambient hyperplane belongs to . Hence all these belong to the finite set . Also , so by [F1] and the choice of . This proves the assertion, counting coincident traces once.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.