How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ko atomic braid relations are exactly the finite BH rank-two relations
Statement
For finitary with , Ko's Definition 4.10 relation with parameters maps under minimal representatives to precisely the two standard expressions for in the Brink–Howlett atomic braid relation. Conversely every Brink–Howlett atomic braid relation for which is finitary arises in this way.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Reduced atomic expressions map factor by factor to standard expressions. Atomic reduced compositions and standard products use the same order
The rotation words start with added vertices and and have common minimum . Rotation parameters and the two switchback completions The corank-two atomic coset has relative longest minimum
The two-generator lemma constructs from the finite-relative-longest element and gives exactly two standard expressions; equating those expressions defines the BH atomic braid relation. The BH definition uses and requires for . Two-generator minimal common left multiple Atomic braid relations
For a finite vertex set , the parabolic group is finite if and only if its parabolic root set is finite. Finite roots and finite Coxeter groups at finite rank
Ko names the rotation-word equality (4.9) the atomic braid relation in Definition 4.10, under the finite-system conventions recorded below.
External input
Ko's Definition 4.10 designates the equality in Proposition 4.9 as the atomic braid relation for in a finite Coxeter system, with . Its two sides are the maximal rotation word and its reversed opposition transform. Taking , and gives source and exactly the words of the rotation-words supplier. This imported definition supplies the name of the relation; the identification of its minimum representatives is proved below.
Proof
Goal: Establish the stated dictionary or identification.
By [F5], the words in [F2] are the two sides of Ko's relation for . Their common minimum is the same finite-relative-longest element that [F3] uses for . By [F1] they give standard expressions, with distinct initial labels and . Since [F3] supplies exactly two standard expressions, these are that pair, up to interchanging the two sides. Their equality is therefore precisely the BH atomic braid relation.
Conversely assume the BH relation has finitary , and put . The group is finite. Its distinct simple generators indexed by lie in , so is finite, and hence is finite. Apply [F4] to to obtain finite . The BH hypothesis in [F3] gives finite , so is finite. Applying [F4] to the finite vertex set proves that is finite. The rotation construction in [F2] now applies with , and step 1.1 recovers the given BH relation. Thus no finitary BH relation is omitted.
Depends on
- Atomic reduced compositions and standard products use the same order
- Rotation parameters and the two switchback completions
- The corank-two atomic coset has relative longest minimum
- Two-generator minimal common left multiple
- Atomic braid relations
- Finite roots and finite Coxeter groups at finite rank
- Hankyung Ko, An atomic Coxeter presentation, arXiv:2312.16666v3 · Section 4 opening and Notation 4.1, PDF p. 13; Proposition 4.9, equation (4.9), and Definition 4.10, PDF p. 15
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Definition 4.10 calls the equality (4.9) in Proposition 4.9 the atomic braid relation for (S,s,t). Its sides are the maximal rotation word and its reversed opposition transform, with source K=S minus {s,bar t}.
Hypotheses: Section 4 works in a finite Coxeter system (W,S), including a finite standard parabolic of an arbitrary Coxeter system; s,t belong to S and t differs from bar s. Apply it with S=T, s=a, t=bar b. Since a differs from b, this condition holds and K=I.
Reading limits: Independently read the extracted v3 PDF text at the Section 4 opening and Notation 4.1, and Proposition 4.9 with equations (4.9)–(4.13) and Definition 4.10. The PDF p. 15 screenshot request failed; no visual inspection is claimed. Only the definition and its displayed sides are imported here; the existing rotation-words supplier supplies reducedness and equality. No whole-paper reading or reconstruction of the cited Elias–Ko results is claimed.
Sources
- Hankyung Ko, An atomic Coxeter presentation, arXiv:2312.16666v3 · Section 4 opening and Notation 4.1, PDF p. 13; Proposition 4.9, equation (4.9), and Definition 4.10, PDF p. 15