Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ko atomic braid relations are exactly the finite BH rank-two relations

Statement

For finitary T=I⊔{a,b} with a≠b, Ko's Definition 4.10 relation with parameters (T,a,bˉ) maps under minimal representatives to precisely the two standard expressions for va,b,I in the Brink–Howlett atomic braid relation. Conversely every Brink–Howlett atomic braid relation for which I is finitary arises in this way.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Reduced atomic expressions map factor by factor to standard expressions. Atomic reduced compositions and standard products use the same order

[F2]

The rotation words start with added vertices b and a and have common minimum wIwT. Rotation parameters and the two switchback completions The corank-two atomic coset has relative longest minimum

[F3]

The two-generator lemma constructs va,b,I from the finite-relative-longest element and gives exactly two standard expressions; equating those expressions defines the BH atomic braid relation. The BH definition uses ΦL={wαi:w∈WL, i∈L} and requires ∣ΦT∖ΦI∣<∞ for T=I⊔{a,b}. Two-generator minimal common left multiple Atomic braid relations

[F4]

For a finite vertex set L, the parabolic group WL is finite if and only if its parabolic root set ΦL is finite. Finite roots and finite Coxeter groups at finite rank

[F5]

Ko names the rotation-word equality (4.9) the atomic braid relation in Definition 4.10, under the finite-system conventions recorded below.

External input

Ko's Definition 4.10 designates the equality in Proposition 4.9 as the atomic braid relation for (S,s,t) in a finite Coxeter system, with t≠sˉ. Its two sides are the maximal rotation word and its reversed opposition transform. Taking S=T, s=a and t=bˉ gives source S∖{s,tˉ}=I and exactly the words of the rotation-words supplier. This imported definition supplies the name of the relation; the identification of its minimum representatives is proved below.

Proof

technique · direct

Goal: Establish the stated dictionary or identification.

1.1F1F2F3F5

By [F5], the words in [F2] are the two sides of Ko's relation for (T,a,bˉ). Their common minimum is the same finite-relative-longest element that [F3] uses for va,b,I. By [F1] they give standard expressions, with distinct initial labels vb,I and va,I. Since [F3] supplies exactly two standard expressions, these are that pair, up to interchanging the two sides. Their equality is therefore precisely the BH atomic braid relation.

2.1givenF2F3F4step 1.1∎

Conversely assume the BH relation has finitary I, and put T=I⊔{a,b}. The group WI is finite. Its distinct simple generators indexed by I lie in WI, so I is finite, and hence T is finite. Apply [F4] to I to obtain finite ΦI. The BH hypothesis in [F3] gives finite ΦT∖ΦI, so ΦT=ΦI∪(ΦT∖ΦI) is finite. Applying [F4] to the finite vertex set T proves that WT is finite. The rotation construction in [F2] now applies with s=a,t=bˉ, and step 1.1 recovers the given BH relation. Thus no finitary BH relation is omitted.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Hankyung Ko, An atomic Coxeter presentation, arXiv:2312.16666v3 · Section 4 opening and Notation 4.1, PDF p. 13; Proposition 4.9, equation (4.9), and Definition 4.10, PDF p. 15

Definition 4.10 calls the equality (4.9) in Proposition 4.9 the atomic braid relation for (S,s,t). Its sides are the maximal rotation word and its reversed opposition transform, with source K=S minus {s,bar t}.

Hypotheses: Section 4 works in a finite Coxeter system (W,S), including a finite standard parabolic of an arbitrary Coxeter system; s,t belong to S and t differs from bar s. Apply it with S=T, s=a, t=bar b. Since a differs from b, this condition holds and K=I.

Reading limits: Independently read the extracted v3 PDF text at the Section 4 opening and Notation 4.1, and Proposition 4.9 with equations (4.9)–(4.13) and Definition 4.10. The PDF p. 15 screenshot request failed; no visual inspection is claimed. Only the definition and its displayed sides are imported here; the existing rotation-words supplier supplies reducedness and equality. No whole-paper reading or reconstruction of the cited Elias–Ko results is claimed.

Sources