How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exactly two words for a two-generator braid element
Statement
Let be any set and a symmetric matrix with and for . Let be its presented positive Artin monoid: finite words on modulo the congruence generated by the standard alternating braid pairs, as constructed in the braid-congruence lemma. Write for the element represented by a word . Fix distinct with . Let and be the alternating length- words starting with and , respectively. The element has exactly the two positive word representatives in . No spherical assumption is needed for this presented monoid.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
For the arbitrary-set presented monoid, positive word equality is equivalent to a finite sequence of braid substitutions, preserving length and support. Its construction defines the alternating braid pairs: each uses a distinct pair , has length and has support on both sides; an infinite parameter supplies no pair. (Braid congruence preserves word length and support)
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and notation in the Statement.
Goal: Determine all positive words representing .
The defining braid relation gives , and the two words are distinct because their initial letters differ. Since , both have support . Every word in a substitution sequence starting at has length and support .
Any applicable braid relation uses a distinct pair whose two letters must both occur in the current word. Thus , and the substituted side has length . Since the current word also has length , both contexts must be empty. The substitution therefore replaces the entire word by or by . By induction on the number of substitutions every word reachable from is or . F1 identifies reachability with equality in , and step 1.1 gives both representatives, proving the assertion.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.