How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Disjoint translates of invariant Salvetti cover members
Statement
For the invariant cover of Natural finite Salvetti good covers, assume the finite diagonal action on is free. Every cover member satisfies for .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The finite arrangement, finite linear group , complement , and invariant cover are those of Natural finite Salvetti good covers. In particular , and distinct cover members intersect only when their incident-pair indices form a chain.
Incident pairs form the partial order of The incident facet and chamber poset, with its reflexivity, transitivity and antisymmetry.
Under the present hypotheses, acts by order automorphisms on , by Linear symmetries act on the Salvetti model, applied with .
Since the diagonal action on is free, Free complement actions have trivial incident-pair stabilizers gives .
Proof
Given: The finite group action, invariant cover, incident-pair order and trivial pair stabilizers in [F1]–[F4]. Goal: Prove that distinct translates of each individual cover member are disjoint.
Proof technique: direct.
Suppose and put . Naturality identifies the second member as . The chain criterion, or reflexivity if the indices coincide, implies that and are comparable in .
Choose if . Otherwise , so applying the order automorphism gives ; in this case choose . Thus . Because is finite, two powers with agree, giving ; put . Applying successive powers of the order automorphism gives . Transitivity and antisymmetry therefore give , including when . Since is or , it follows that .
The trivial pair-stabilizer conclusion now gives . Consequently a nonidentity cannot satisfy , which proves the assertion.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.