Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A uniform inverse-sine majorant and geometric angular tail

Statement

Put h=3.168, t=3.326, r=t/h and q=2.1274, with these decimals interpreted as exact rationals. For 0≤x≤1/4, arcsin⁡x≤rx. Consequently, for every real C≥63.295, the series ∑k=0∞arcsin⁡(h/(Cqk)) converges and its sum is at most t/(C(1−1/q)). For every integer m≥0, the tail series also converges and satisfies 0≤∑k=m∞arcsin⁡(h/(Cqk))≤t/(Cqm(1−1/q)).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Rational sine enclosures from a finite factorial sum gives y−y3/6≤sin⁡y≤y for rational y with 0≤y≤1; in particular sin⁡0=0.

[F2]

Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine supplies sine continuity and strict increase on [−π/2,π/2], and its principal inverse.

[F3]

Rational logarithm and pi enclosures after range reduction supplies a rational enclosure of π; its N=1 Machin bound gives π>3.

[F4]

Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series defines a series sum as the limit of its partial sums and defines the tail starting at an integer m≥0 as the series with terms am+j for integers j≥0.

[F5]

A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum states that a real series with nonnegative terms converges if its partial sums are bounded above, and its sum is then the supremum of those partial sums.

[F6]

The rationals embed densely in the reals states that strictly between any two distinct real numbers lies a rational number.

Proof

Given: The exact rational constants above, and real C≥63.295 and integer m≥0 for the series and tail claims.

Goal: Prove the stated inverse-sine and geometric-tail estimates.

1.1givenF1F2F3F6choosealgebra

We first extend the lower bound in [F1] to all real y∈[0,1]. Put p(y)=y−y3/6. For y,z∈[0,1], factorization gives ∣p(z)−p(y)∣=∣z−y∣ ∣1−(z2+zy+y2)/6∣≤(3/2)∣z−y∣. The endpoints y=0,1 are rational, so [F1] applies there. Fix real 0<y<1 and ε>0. By [F3], [0,1]⊂[−π/2,π/2], and continuity in [F2] gives δ>0 such that ∣sin⁡z−sin⁡y∣<ε/2 for branch points z with ∣z−y∣<δ. Set η=min⁡{δ,ε/3,y,1−y}>0. By [F6], choose a rational z strictly between y−η and y+η. Then 0<z<1, ∣p(z)−p(y)∣<ε/2, and [F1] gives p(z)≤sin⁡z. Therefore p(y)<p(z)+ε/2≤sin⁡z+ε/2<sin⁡y+ε. Since this holds for every ε>0, p(y)≤sin⁡y: a positive difference would violate it at half that difference. Thus y−y3/6≤sin⁡y for every real 0≤y≤1.

2.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Exact rational arithmetic gives 1<r<21/20 and r−r3/96>1. For 0≤x≤1/4, 0≤rx≤21/80<1<π/2, and step 1.1 yields sin⁡(rx)≥rx−r3x3/6≥x(r−r3/96)≥x. By increasing-branch inversion, arcsin⁡x≤rx. Since sin⁡0=0, the same branch inversion gives arcsin⁡0=0 and arcsin⁡x≥0 for x≥0 in this interval. At x=0 equality holds.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra

Since h/63.295<1/4 and q>1, for every integer k≥0 the argument h/(Cqk) lies in [0,1/4]. Set ak=arcsin⁡(h/(Cqk)). Step 2.1 gives 0≤ak≤t/(Cqk). Thus these are well-defined nonnegative real terms.

4.1givenF4step 3.1algebra

Put ρ=1/q, so 0<ρ<1. For integers m,n≥0, let Pm,n=∑j=0n−1am+j and Gn=∑j=0n−1ρj, with both sums zero when n=0. The finite telescoping identity (1−ρ)Gn=∑j=0n−1(ρj−ρj+1)=1−ρn holds also at n=0. Since 0<ρn≤1, it gives 0≤Gn≤1/(1−ρ). Termwise finite summation of step 3.1 therefore gives 0≤Pm,n≤(t/(Cqm))Gn≤Bm, where Bm=t/(Cqm(1−1/q)) is positive and independent of n.

5.1givenF4F5step 3.1step 4.1∎

Fix any integer m≥0. By [F4], Pm,n are precisely the partial sums of the tail series with terms am+j. These terms are nonnegative by step 3.1, and their partial sums are bounded above by Bm by step 4.1. Hence [F5] proves convergence and identifies the tail sum with the supremum of these partial sums, which lies in [0,Bm]. This proves the stated tail bound for every integer m≥0; taking m=0 gives convergence and the bound for the full series.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.