How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonbacktracking tail smaller than the required polynomial
Statement
Fix . With and as in the normalization and ordered-pair definitions, for every sufficiently large , The size cutoff may depend on and on the universal constants in the external theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
The normalized matrix is real symmetric, hence Hermitian, with independent mean-zero upper-triangular entries. It has row variance at most 1, entry variance at most , entry bound , and eventually (Normalize the logarithmic random graph for nonbacktracking estimates).
Under independent mean-zero Hermitian upper entries with row variance sum at most 1, entry variance at most , and entry bound , Theorem 2.5 gives universal with for and ..
The natural logarithm is strictly increasing on , is onto , and satisfies (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
The logarithm is inverse to the exponential (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).
External input
For a matrix , its nonbacktracking matrix is indexed by ordered vertex pairs and has . Write . Under independent mean-zero Hermitian upper entries with row variance sum at most 1, entry variance at most , and entry bound , Theorem 2.5 gives universal with for and .
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Prove its conclusions.
Apply [F2] to [F1] with and . This gives . All normalization and independence hypotheses are precisely those in [F1].
By [F3], . For each real , surjectivity gives with , and monotonicity gives for every integer . Hence . Since and are fixed, eventually and . Then the right side in step 1.1 is at most .
Depends on
- Normalize the logarithmic random graph for nonbacktracking estimates
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- Benaych-Georges, Bordenave and Knowles, Spectral radii of sparse random matrices (19 September 2019) · PDF p. 3, Definition 2.1; p. 4, Assumption 2.4 and Theorem 2.5
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Under independent mean-zero Hermitian upper entries with row variance sum at most 1, entry variance at most $\kappa/n$, and entry bound $1/q$, Theorem 2.5 gives universal $C,c>0$ with $\mathbb P(\rho(B)\ge1+t)\le Cn^{3-cq\log(1+t)}$ for $1\vee q\le n^{1/10}\kappa^{-1/9}$ and $t\ge0$.
Hypotheses: Hermitian H with independent mean-zero upper entries; q>0, kappa>=1 and all three bounds in Assumption 2.4; 1 vee q<=n^(1/10) kappa^(-1/9).
Reading limits: Checked the extracted PDF text on pp. 3–4, including Definition 2.1, Theorem 2.2, Assumption 2.4 and Theorem 2.5. The theorem is imported, not locally reconstructed; its proof and the remaining paper were not reviewed for this application.
Sources
- Benaych-Georges, Bordenave and Knowles, Spectral radii of sparse random matrices (19 September 2019) · PDF p. 3, Definition 2.1; p. 4, Assumption 2.4 and Theorem 2.5