How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Disconnected and bipartite spectral witnesses
Statement
For a labelled simple -regular graph on vertices with , let be its adjacency matrix and write , where is the all-ones matrix. A connected component is a maximal set of vertices joined by paths; a component is bipartite if it splits into two disjoint parts with each edge joining different parts. If is disconnected, or has a bipartite connected component, then . Consequently, for any , the inequality excludes both obstructions.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Ordered eigenvalues and the centered regular norm identifies with the norm of on . Its proof step 1.1 bounds every adjacency eigenvalue in absolute value by , using a maximum-modulus coordinate of a nonzero eigenvector and the nonnegative row sum .
Pairings, simple-graph conditioning and model transfer supplies the labelled simple regular graph and incidence conventions.
The adjacency matrix of a finite simple graph defines to be for an edge and otherwise; hence is the sum of over neighbours of .
Walks, paths, connectedness and components in a simple graph on an arbitrary vertex set defines paths, connectedness and connected components.
Proof
Given: The regular graph and either of the stated obstructions.
Goal: Exhibit a mean-zero eigenvector of eigenvalue or .
If is a nonempty proper connected component, its indicator satisfies : vertices in have all neighbours in , and vertices outside have none in . Thus is nonzero, has coordinate sum zero and satisfies . By [F1] this forces , while the eigenvalue bound gives the reverse inequality.
If a connected component has bipartition , counting its edges at each end gives . Since , . Let equal on , on and zero elsewhere. It is nonzero, has coordinate sum zero and satisfies , because every neighbour of a vertex in the component has the opposite sign. Again [F1] forces . Either obstruction therefore contradicts , proving the conclusion.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.