How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exponential clocks and the uniform edge-order process
Statement
Assume countable choice and use independent uniform edge labels for the possible edges of a graph on vertices. Set and for . The clocks are independent and satisfy ; a rate-one exponential clock means precisely this distribution. The graph containing edges with equals . Almost surely all clocks are finite and distinct, and their edge ordering is uniform. If is the time the th edge appears, then for . Hence an assertion holding for every real holds for every indexed graph with , where is the connectivity index.
Facts & Assumptions
Independent uniform labels give the threshold graphs and almost surely a uniform strict ordering of all edges; the first-connected index is bounded and connectivity persists under edge addition (Uniform edge orderings, graph-process times and independent labels).
The natural logarithm is the inverse of the exponential by The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function; it is strictly increasing and satisfies by Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm.
A real-valued function on a measurable space is measurable if and only if every lower threshold set , for real , is measurable (Threshold characterisations of real-valued and extended-real-valued measurability).
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Goal: Establish all stated claims.
Write for . Since , is finite and nonnegative. It is strictly increasing: if , then , so . For , logarithm inversion and monotonicity give exactly when , with .
Give its Borel sigma-algebra. For any real , ; for , this set is , a Borel subset of . Hence [F3] makes Borel measurable. For every Borel set , the event is measurable because is a random label and is Borel. Thus each is a random variable. For distinct edges and arbitrary Borel sets , independence of the labels gives . This proves independence for all Borel clock events.
For , the threshold equivalence gives by the uniform threshold law in [F1]. Edge by edge it also gives for every .
The transformation from labels to clocks is strictly increasing, so it preserves their strict order outside the label-tie event of probability zero. At the th arrival, precisely the first edges have appeared. Connectedness is preserved thereafter, so is the first connected clock time, and substituting proves every indexed assertion. This argument evaluates a single pathwise assertion and uses no union bound at random times.
Depends on
- Uniform edge orderings, graph-process times and independent labels
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- Threshold characterisations of real-valued and extended-real-valued measurability
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.