How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A spectral window giving condition number below two
Statement
For a connected graph with positive degrees and normalized Laplacian as defined above, suppose and for . Then .
Facts & Assumptions
The normalized Laplacian has ordered nontrivial eigenvalues and (Normalized graph Laplacian and its nontrivial spectrum).
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Goal: Establish all stated claims.
The assumed window gives and . Dividing nonnegative quantities by the positive lower bound yields .
Since , the inequality is equivalent to , or , which is assumed. Combining the bounds proves the claim.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.