Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Shifted-root comparison — Remark 6.10

PDF p. 37: Remark 6.10

Statement

Let h(c)=(1+c)log⁡(1+c)−c for c>−1, where log⁡ is the natural logarithm. For γ>1, let c−(γ)∈(−1,0) and c+(γ)>0 be the respective roots of γh(c)=1. For 0<ε<1 and 1+ε<γ<1+ε−2, let c−(γ,ε)<0 and c+(γ,ε)>0 be the respective roots of γh(c−ε)=1+ε and γh(c+ε)=1+ε, with positive logarithm arguments. Then

−1<c−(γ)≤c−(γ,ε)<0<c+(γ,ε)≤c+(γ).

For each fixed γ>1, as ε↓0 through admissible values, c±(γ,ε)→c±(γ). Moreover, for every 0<ε<1,

1+ε−2≤1+ε(1−ε)log⁡(1−ε)+ε.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The rate-function definition supplies h and the unique unshifted roots on the stated branches (Degree large-deviation rate function and roots).

[F2]

The shifted-root definition supplies the unique roots of the two shifted equations with their stated signs and positive logarithm arguments (Shifted rate roots for quantitative expansion).

[F3]

Put I(a)=alog⁡a−a+1 for a>0. The entropy-root geometry gives its lower and upper inverse branches a− and a+, the formulas c±(γ)=a±(1/γ)−1 and c±(γ,ε)=a±((1+ε)/γ)−1∓ε, their strict inward ordering and their fixed-γ limits. It also gives 1+ε−2<(1+ε)/I(1−ε) under the stated parameter hypotheses (Entropy rates, inverse branches and shifted root contracts).

Proof

Given: The parameters and roots in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the comparison, the limits and the scalar bound.

1.1F1F2F3algebra

Since h(c)=I(1+c), the unique roots in [F1] and [F2] agree with the corresponding branch formulas in [F3]. Under the stated parameter hypotheses, [F3] gives the stronger inequalities −1<c−(γ)<c−(γ,ε)<0<c+(γ,ε)<c+(γ), and hence the displayed weak comparisons. For fixed γ>1, sufficiently small positive ε are admissible, and [F3] gives both limits.

2.1F3choosealgebra∎

For any 0<ε<1, the interval (1+ε,1+ε−2) is nonempty because ε<ε−2. Choose γ in that interval. The scalar bound in [F3] applies, and I(1−ε)=(1−ε)log⁡(1−ε)+ε. Its strict inequality implies the asserted weak inequality.

Source attribution

The notation and assertions are attributed to Remark 6.10 of the cited article. The proof uses the mathematical suppliers above, not the article as a premise.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources