Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bipartite Ramanujan existence and the centered spectrum

Statement

For every integer d≥3 there is a sequence of finite simple d-regular bipartite graphs whose vertex counts tend to infinity and whose adjacency eigenvalues other than the source's trivial values d and −d lie in [−2d−1,2d−1]. Here bipartite means that the vertices have two parts and every edge joins different parts; d-regular means that each vertex has exactly d neighbors. The adjacency matrix A has entry one at adjacent pairs and zero elsewhere.

For each such graph, with n vertices and all-ones matrix J, the centered adjacency norm satisfies ∥A−(d/n)J∥op≥d>2d−1. Thus the existence theorem with both trivial values excluded does not itself provide the centered absolute-spectrum bound ∥A−(d/n)J∥op≤2d−1.

External input

The existence and nontrivial-eigenvalue bound in the first paragraph are imported from Marcus, Spielman and Srivastava, Section 2.1 and Theorem 5.5. Their proof starts with a complete bipartite graph and obtains graphs of twice the preceding order; the cited interlacing and lifting machinery is not reconstructed here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer d≥3 and a graph supplied by the external input, with bipartition V=L⊔R.

Goal: Establish the stated comparison with the centered adjacency norm.

[F1]

The imported theorem supplies the graphs and their nontrivial spectral bound, with both d and −d designated trivial in the bipartite case.

[F2]

For a finite simple graph, adjacency is represented by its symmetric zero-diagonal 0–1 matrix; its row sums are its vertex degrees (Finite symmetric networks and loop removal).

[F3]

For a symmetric nonnegative matrix with constant row sum d>0, the centered operator A−(d/n)J agrees with A on the vectors of coordinate sum zero, and its norm is the norm of that restriction (Regular adjacency spectra and normalized expansion).

Proof

1.1givenF2algebra

Counting edges from the two sides gives d∣L∣=d∣R∣, so ∣L∣=∣R∣. Define v to be 1 on L and −1 on R. It is nonzero and has coordinate sum zero. Each neighbor of a vertex lies in the opposite part, and every vertex has d neighbors; therefore Av=−dv.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra∎

By [F3], (A−(d/n)J)v=Av=−dv. The definition of operator norm applied to this nonzero vector gives ∥A−(d/n)J∥op≥d. Since d≥3, (d−2)2>0, and hence d2>4(d−1), which gives d>2d−1. Together with the imported existence statement [F1], this proves the claim and the stated limitation of the bipartite convention.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Interlacing families I: Bipartite Ramanujan graphs of all degrees · Section 2.1, printed p. 308; Theorem 5.5 and its proof, printed p. 316

For every integer d at least 3 there is an infinite sequence of d-regular bipartite Ramanujan graphs. In the source convention the eigenvalues d and, for a bipartite graph, -d are trivial; every nontrivial eigenvalue lies between -2 sqrt(d-1) and 2 sqrt(d-1). The proof produces successive graphs with twice as many vertices.

Hypotheses: An integer d at least 3; finite d-regular bipartite graphs, with Ramanujan defined using the source's trivial-eigenvalue convention.

Reading limits: Read Section 2.1 and the statement and proof paragraph of Theorem 5.5. The interlacing-polynomial, signing and 2-lift machinery used by the source was not reconstructed or independently verified. The centered-spectrum comparison below is a local deduction, not a claim attributed to the source.

Sources