How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A Knill–Laflamme decoder retaining the code syndrome
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional isometry with nonzero logical space, , and let be finite matrices. Assume the scalar Knill–Laflamme products for : . Put and . There is a CPTP decoder such that, writing , , and . Moreover whenever . These are linear-map identities and persist under any finite reference extension.
Facts & Assumptions
Isometric encoding and a decoded recovery have the stated finite channel types. Code restriction and decoded channel types
A finite scalar-product error family can be unitarily mixed into positive-weight orthogonal isometric error ranges, with zero-weight restrictions vanishing. A unitary error-basis change gives orthogonal error ranges
For finite-dimensional complex inner-product spaces, a complex-linear map given by a finite Kraus sum is a quantum channel when the Kraus operators have adjoint-square sum equal to the input identity (condition 3 implies condition 1). Finite channel, Kraus, Choi, and Stinespring equivalence
The tensor product of finite-dimensional linear maps is the unique linear map with the specified factorwise action on elementary tensors. Tensor products of finitely many linear maps
Proof
Given: The isometry and scalar products including the identity. Goal: Construct a decoder with the claimed branch and cross-term identities.
Write and . Then and . Apply [F2] to this centered family: its nonzero mixed restrictions are , where the are isometries with pairwise orthogonal ranges. Since each is orthogonal to , every range is also orthogonal to that code range. The scalar Gram matrix is positive because is its quadratic form times .
Put . Choose a unit logical vector and an orthonormal basis of . The decoder has Kraus operators , , and . Their adjoint-square sum is , so [F3], applied with input space and output space , makes their finite Kraus sum a completely positive trace-preserving map. On a code/complement cross term every Kraus congruence vanishes: either the code factor or its orthogonal factor is annihilated. This proves the cross-term identity and .
Expand in the mutually orthogonal ranges . Each coefficient is scalar, so the decoder sends to the sum of their squared magnitudes times , which is because . Summing gives . Finally , hence with . The cross-term property in step 2.1 gives both anticommutator identities. These are equalities on the full logical matrix space.
Let be any finite-dimensional complex reference space, and write . For or , identify with by sending to the operator . The latter operator is supplied by [F4]; in finite ordered bases the tensors of matrix units act as the matrix units of the product basis, so this correspondence is a linear isomorphism. By [F4], the amplification of any linear map on operator spaces satisfies . Apply the identities in steps 2.1 and 3.1 to each ; linearity gives the identities for every operator on the reference-extended space, since these elementary operators span it. This includes the cross-term maps for each fixed with .
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.