How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transpose fidelity from the QEC matrix
PDF p. 2: Eq. (6); PDF p. 8: Eq. (S1.6)
Statement
Let , where , and let be nonzero finite-dimensional complex coordinate spaces. Let be an isometry, , and a quantum channel with finite nonempty Kraus family , so . A quantum channel is a completely positive trace-preserving linear map. Write for the encoded logical basis and define the QEC matrix by in the ordered logical-error product basis.
Put . Let be the inverse of its positive square root on its support and zero on its kernel. Let be any transpose recovery obtained from the Kraus operators by completing the map outside the support of with a code state. Encode by , apply and , and decode the code-supported output by ; call the resulting logical channel . Its entanglement fidelity at the maximally mixed input is
Here is the positive square root, contracts the logical indices, and . The formula includes singular and and is independent of the completion choice. The article attributes this expression to Ref. [40].
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The QEC matrix has the displayed entries in the logical-error product basis; its logical partial trace contracts the logical indices and the squared Frobenius norm is the sum of squared entry moduli. QEC matrix and logical partial trace
The support-completed transpose recovery is a code-supported channel, and its action after noise on code-supported operators is independent of the completion choice. Transpose (Petz) recovery on a code
Entanglement fidelity at the maximally mixed logical input is the overlap of a normalized maximally entangled state with its image under the identity on a reference tensor the logical channel. Entanglement fidelity on a finite logical space
For , the operator is positive semidefinite and has the QEC matrix entries. QEC matrix as an error-vector Gram operator
For a finite-dimensional isometric code, a channel with a finite Kraus family and its support-completed transpose recovery, the decoded logical channel has entanglement fidelity , including the singular case. Independent transpose Gram fidelity formula
Proof
Given: The finite spaces, isometry, channel, Kraus family and transpose recovery in the statement.
Goal: Establish the displayed formula and its independence of the support-completion choice.
Define on the logical-error product basis by . The Gram factorization gives the entries of as , so the definition of the QEC matrix identifies . In particular is positive semidefinite and has the positive square root used in the formula.
The hypotheses of the independent transpose Gram-fidelity formula hold for this isometry, channel, Kraus family and support-completed recovery. Applying it to the decoded channel and substituting from step 1.1 gives , with the partial trace and norm as in the statement. The fidelity is the functional specified in [F3], and [F2] shows that the completed recovery has the same action after the noise for every choice of code state; hence the result is completion-independent. The supplier includes singular matrices.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Monolithic Quantum Error Correction in the Presence of Distinguishability · PDF p. 2, Eq. (6); PDF p. 8, Eq. (S1.6)