Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spectral cutoff dual tests and the exact interpolation lower bound

Statement

Assume AC. Let T≥I be self-adjoint on a nonzero complex Hilbert space K, with first-variable-linear inner product, and use the admissible strip class for (K,D(T)) and the exact domain norm ∥Tv∥K. If F is admissible and Mj=sup⁡t∥F(j+it)∥Xj, then F(θ)∈D(Tθ) and ∥TθF(θ)∥≤M01−θM1θ, for 0<θ<1. Thus [K,D(T)]θ=D(Tθ) isometrically, including for the strip convention with vanishing boundary values.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The strip class, sum norm, complex-power convention and exact upper inequality are as defined in the spectral-profile lemma Admissible spectral strip profiles and the exact interpolation upper bound.

[F2]

Spectral cutoffs, multiplier norm integrals and monotone convergence characterize the domain of T to the power theta Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping.

[F3]

Scalar three-lines applies to bounded continuous scalar strip functions holomorphic in the interior, including zero endpoint bounds Hadamard three-lines theorem.

[F4]

AC is retained for the spectral suppliers The Axiom of Choice.

[F5]

A complex Hilbert space is complete for its inner-product norm Hilbert space. Under the assumed AC, self-adjoint means that the densely defined operator equals its adjoint, with equal domains and values Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators.

[F6]

For the first-variable-linear inner product, Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥ for all u,v∈K Cauchy–Schwarz: |⟨ u,v⟩|≤‖ u‖‖ v‖, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors.

Proof

Given: The data and AC in the statement.

Goal: All asserted identifications and bounds, with the stated exact norms.

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6

Let PN=ET([1,N]), h∈K, and ϕN(z)=⟨F(z),Tz‾PNh⟩. Since Tz‾PNh is norm-antiholomorphic (the logarithm is bounded on the cutoff), this is scalar holomorphic inside and continuous on S. By Cauchy–Schwarz its modulus is bounded on all S by N∥h∥sup⁡S∥F(z)∥K. At z=it its modulus is at most M0∥h∥, since imaginary powers are unitary. At z=1+it, the self-adjoint multiplier product gives ϕN(1+it)=⟨TF(1+it),T−itPNh⟩, so the bound is M1∥h∥. All scalar three-lines hypotheses, including boundedness throughout the strip rather than just the boundary, have now been verified.

2.1F1F2F3F5step 1.1∎

Three-lines yields ∣⟨TθPNF(θ),h⟩∣≤M01−θM1θ∥h∥. Taking h to be the normalized vector on the left when it is nonzero gives ∥TθPNF(θ)∥≤M01−θM1θ. The squares of these norms increase to ∫[1,∞)λ2θ d(ET)F(θ). Their uniform bound makes this integral finite; the exact Borel-calculus domain formula proves the membership and inequality. Taking the infimum over F gives the lower inequality; the upper inequality from the profile lemma proves equality, and hence definiteness and completeness of this interpolation norm. No density assertion about analytic functions and no preexisting operator interpolation theorem is used.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.