Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Whole-space H² regularity from an L² distributional Laplacian

Statement

Assume AC. If v∈L2(Rn) and Δv=h∈L2(Rn) distributionally, then v∈H2(Rn) and ∥v∥H2≤Cn(∥v∥2+∥h∥2). The Fourier transform uses ∂jv^=2πiξjv^; the weak-derivative H2 norm and the weight (1+4π2∣ξ∣2) norm are equivalent, rather than identical.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions of the Statement.

[F1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice; its countable instances supply the choice hypotheses inherited from the Fourier, Sobolev and regular-distribution interfaces below. No additional choice is used in the local computation.

[F2]

Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers gives F(Dαu)=(2πiξ)αFu for u∈S′(Rn). Summing the pure second derivatives gives F(Δu)=−4π2∣ξ∣2Fu. This use does not assume that the individual second derivatives belong to L2.

[F3]

Plancherel theorem gives a unitary transform F2:L2→L2, with ∥F2f∥2=∥f∥2.

[F4]

Every L2 class f defines the regular tempered distribution uf(φ)=∫fφ by Polynomial growth functions define tempered distributions, and Fuf=uF2f in S′ by Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms.

[F5]

Smooth polynomially bounded multipliers on schwartz space defines multiplication by a smooth symbol with polynomially bounded derivatives through ⟨au,φ⟩=⟨u,aφ⟩. In particular, for a polynomial a and an L2 class f, this pairing is ∫afφ, so auf=uaf; the product af is locally integrable because a is bounded on each compact set.

[F6]

Locally integrable functions embed in distributions makes the regular-distribution map injective modulo almost-everywhere equality on Lloc1. Thus equality of regular distributions implies equality of their locally integrable representatives almost everywhere.

[F7]

Weighted tempered-distribution characterization of Hˢ states that u∈S′ belongs to the canonical image of Hs if and only if ⟨ξ⟩sFu=ug for some g∈L2, with ∥Es−1u∥Hs=∥g∥2. Here ⟨ξ⟩=(1+∣ξ∣2)1/2; the application below is at s=2.

[F8]

Integer-order W^k,2 and Hᵏ agree with equivalent norms identifies the canonical image of H2 with the regular distributions of W2,2 classes, and compares the weak-derivative norm with ∥⟨ξ⟩2F2f∥2 and ∥(1+4π2∣ξ∣2)F2f∥2, with constants depending only on n.

[F9]

Tempered distributions embed continuously in distributions states that restriction from S′ to compactly supported tests is injective. Thus equality of two tempered distributions on compactly supported tests is equality in S′.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the stated regularity and norm estimate.

1.1F1F2F4F5F9given

By F4, v,h define tempered distributions uv,uh. The distributional hypothesis gives Δuv=uh on compactly supported tests. The left side is tempered by F2, so F9 gives the same equality in S′. Write v^=F2v and h^=F2h. Applying F2, F4 and F5 yields uh^=−4π2∣ξ∣2uv^=u−4π2∣ξ∣2v^ in S′.

2.1F3F5F6step 1.1

By F3, v^,h^∈L2. The polynomial multiple −4π2∣ξ∣2v^ is locally integrable, as in F5, so restriction of step 1.1 to compactly supported tests and F6 give h^=−4π2∣ξ∣2v^ almost everywhere. In particular ∣ξ∣2v^∈L2, and F3 gives ∥∣ξ∣2v^∥2=(4π2)−1∥h∥2.

3.1F3F4F5F7step 2.1algebra

Step 2.1 and F3 give ∥(1+4π2∣ξ∣2)v^∥2≤∥v∥2+∥h∥2. Since 1+∣ξ∣2≤1+4π2∣ξ∣2, the class g=⟨ξ⟩2v^ lies in L2 and satisfies ∥g∥2≤∥v∥2+∥h∥2. By F4 and F5, ⟨ξ⟩2Fuv=ug, where the multiplier is the polynomial 1+∣ξ∣2. Applying F7 at s=2 therefore gives uv=E2U for a unique U∈H2 with ∥U∥H2=∥g∥2.

4.1F6F8step 3.1∎

By F8, the distribution E2U=uv is uf for a class f∈W2,2. F6 implies f=v almost everywhere, so v has all weak derivatives through order two in L2. The norm comparison in F8 and step 3.1 give ∥v∥W2,2≤Cn∥g∥2≤Cn(∥v∥2+∥h∥2); the Bessel-potential norm of the same class is already bounded in step 3.1. Hence the asserted H2 regularity and estimate hold with either stated equivalent norm.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.