How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
AIK perturbative global regularity and bifurcation package
Definition
The AIK perturbative GR/SBS package means the following specified data and conditions of Alexakis–Ionescu–Klainerman (AIK), arXiv:0904.0982v1 §1.1. Work with a connected oriented time-oriented smooth paracompact boundaryless four-spacetime , , a smooth Killing field , and an embedded spacelike partial Cauchy surface (acausal and edgeless) parametrized by , where .
Here acausal has the causal-set interface's meaning: no two distinct points of the surface are joined by a causal curve in . For an achronal set , its causal edge consists of those for which every open neighborhood of admits , and a future timelike curve from to contained in . The sets use the restricted spacetime . Edgeless means that this edge is empty. The partial Cauchy condition on requires acausality and edgelessness in the ambient ; neither follows here merely from spacelikeness.
GR supplies an open end with a chart extending the slice chart, , and where , , , and . All index sums are over their displayed ranges; the differentiated convention is the source one (including time derivatives, which vanish on the stationary end). Put . Require globally hyperbolic, , nowhere zero on , and every exterior -orbit complete and meeting .
SBS requires to be the bifurcation sphere of the two event boundaries. In a neighborhood of , and are smooth embedded null nonexpanding hypersurfaces, transverse with intersection . Require tangent to both and . Nonexpanding means zero null second-fundamental-form trace. This perturbative package does not add maximality of ; maximality belongs to other source contracts below.
For either local sheet , null means that has signature and radical . A local generator field is a smooth nonzero future-directed section of this null normal line. The screen is , with positive metric . The null second fundamental form on the screen and its expansion are and . On a transverse spacelike two-section , this is with . Nonexpansion in SBS requires everywhere on each local sheet, including , for every such local generator field. The trace is on the positive screen or section metric; the degenerate metric on is not inverted.
Definition references
Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data
Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons
Regular bifurcate null horizon data before rigidity
Facts & Assumptions
Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions gives Lorentzian, Killing and connection data; Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data gives ambient chronological sets, boundaries, exterior and causal predicates.
Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data defines spacelike sections and their normals. Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data defines the section null form and its trace. Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity defines differentiated asymptotic arrays and constants; the source time-derivative version agrees on the stationary end.
Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons supplies acausality and achronality. Minguzzi supplies the ambient causal-edge definition and the acausal-edgeless partial Cauchy terminology specified in External input.
Regular bifurcate null horizon data before rigidity supplies the local radical, generator and section-expansion terminology. Only these definitional clauses are used; its additional affine-generator and relative causal-boundary requirements are not added to GR/SBS. Gourgoulhon–Jaramillo supplies the general null-hypersurface form, quotient trace and normalization properties specified in External input.
AIK section 1.1 supplies the source-specific GR/SBS clauses, including the strict parameter gap and nonidentically zero stationary field on the sphere. Its exact imported formulation and reading limits are recorded in the first source reference and External input.
Justification
Each clause is a predicate on the supplied metric, field, embeddings and charts. The end coordinate derivatives and the exterior chronological sets are computed in their explicitly specified domains. The surface parametrization fixes the particular sphere , and the separate horizon conditions test its event boundaries; they do not assert that a bifurcate Killing generator has already been constructed. No implication from a weaker regularity definition to this package is asserted. In particular the explicit angular leading term, strict subextremal parameter bound and nonzero-horizon-field clause remain part of this source contract.
The acausality interface and the imported causal-edge definition make the partial Cauchy requirement precise, with ambient closure retained. The cited null-hypersurface construction supplies the well-defined form on the positive screen and its section trace; its rescaling rule makes zero expansion independent of positive generator normalization. Thus the section formula agrees with the supplied null-screen convention without treating a two-surface definition alone as a definition on an entire hypersurface. These are geometric definitions and imported well-definedness facts, not a physical field law or a locally reconstructed horizon theorem.
External input
AIK, section 1.1 supplies the GR/SBS assumptions transcribed above, with footnotes 3, 5 and 6 fixing the manifold, differentiated-decay and nonexpansion conventions. This item records those assumptions only; the PK hypothesis and global rigidity theorem are separate inputs.
Minguzzi, Definitions 2.130 and 3.35 supplies the causal-edge and partial Cauchy definitions. In particular the edge test ranges over the ambient closure, and all curves in a neighborhood test remain in that neighborhood. No theorem that a supplied surface satisfies this test is asserted.
Gourgoulhon–Jaramillo, sections 2.2, 2.6–2.7, 5.6 and 5.8 supplies the local null-hypersurface construction and its well-definedness facts. The form annihilates the radical, the trace can be computed in any transverse spacelike section, and positive normal rescaling preserves its zero set. These geometric facts apply to the smooth local sheets in SBS without field equations or a global section. The full locators, hypotheses and reading limits are in the third source reference.
Depends on
- Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
- Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
- Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
- Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data
- Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
- Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons
- Regular bifurcate null horizon data before rigidity
- S. Alexakis, A. D. Ionescu and S. Klainerman, Uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes in vacuum: small perturbations of the Kerr spaces · Section 1.1, opening setup and footnote 3; GR, equations (1.1)–(1.3) and footnote 5; SBS and footnote 6.
- E. Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory, Living Reviews in Relativity 22 (2019), article 3 · Section 2.18, Definition 2.130, printed/PDF p. 76; section 3.2, Definition 3.35, printed/PDF p. 95.
- E. Gourgoulhon and J. L. Jaramillo, A 3+1 perspective on null hypersurfaces and isolated horizons, arXiv:gr-qc/0503113v2 · Section 2.2, (2.10)–(2.11), pp. 18–19; sections 2.6–2.7, (2.46)–(2.57) and Remark 2.8, pp. 28–31; section 5.6, (5.65), (5.71) and Remark 5.2, pp. 72–74; section 5.8, (5.114), p. 81 (printed and one-based PDF pages).
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The setup specifies a connected oriented time-oriented smooth paracompact boundaryless vacuum four-spacetime, a smooth Killing field and an embedded partial Cauchy surface parametrized by E_{1/2}. GR specifies the stationary end chart, the three metric expansions (1.1), positive mass M and angular magnitude J in [0,M^2), the globally hyperbolic exterior, both slice identities (1.3), and nonvanishing complete exterior Killing orbits meeting the slice. SBS specifies the sphere at r=1, smooth embedded transverse null event-boundary sheets near it, zero trace of each null second fundamental form, tangency of the stationary field and the requirement that it not vanish identically on the sphere. No maximality is included in this GR/SBS passage.
Hypotheses: These are stipulated geometric data and assumptions in AIK section 1.1, not conclusions inferred from asymptotic flatness alone. The exterior and both boundaries are computed in the given spacetime; the horizon-sheet assertions are local near S_0. PK and the Main Theorem are not imported here.
Reading limits: Consulted the arXiv v1 HTML text of section 1.1, its opening setup, GR (1.1)–(1.3), SBS, and footnotes 3, 5 and 6 in this assignment. Checked the transcription of these assumptions only. No source theorem proof, global rigidity argument or library proof audit was performed.
For an achronal set S, edge(S) consists of q in the ambient closure of S such that every open neighborhood U of q contains a point a in I_U^-(q), a point b in I_U^+(q), and a timelike curve from a to b within U avoiding S. A partial Cauchy hypersurface is an acausal edgeless set.
Hypotheses: A time-oriented Lorentzian spacetime and an achronal subset S; edge is computed using the ambient closure and chronological curves confined to U. For the partial Cauchy terminology require acausality and empty edge. The present smooth metric and embedded spacelike surface are within this setting.
Reading limits: Read the PDF text of Definition 2.130 and Definition 3.35, with their immediately adjacent explanations. This imports definitions only, not domain-of-dependence theorems or an assertion that an arbitrary embedded spacelike surface is edgeless.
A smooth null hypersurface has degenerate induced signature (0,+,+) with a tangent null normal. Its symmetric null second fundamental form vanishes when either argument is the normal, hence is a form on the tangent quotient by the normal line. Expansion is its trace in a spacelike section, independent of the section for a fixed normal; positive rescaling of the normal multiplies the form and expansion by the same factor.
Hypotheses: A smooth null hypersurface in a smooth time-oriented four-dimensional Lorentzian manifold, a smooth nonzero local null normal, and local transverse spacelike sections. These are geometric constructions; neither a field equation, an energy condition, compact sections nor an isolated-horizon structure is used for the cited formulas.
Reading limits: Read the PDF text at the cited nullness definition, Weingarten and second-form formulas, quotient remark, expansion definition, section-independence remark and rescaling formula. The screen/section formulation below retains these local geometric hypotheses. No Einstein-equation or isolated-horizon theorem, global foliation, global generator normalization or source-proof audit is imported.
Sources
- S. Alexakis, A. D. Ionescu and S. Klainerman, Uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes in vacuum: small perturbations of the Kerr spaces · Section 1.1, opening setup and footnote 3; GR, equations (1.1)–(1.3) and footnote 5; SBS and footnote 6.
- E. Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory, Living Reviews in Relativity 22 (2019), article 3 · Section 2.18, Definition 2.130, printed/PDF p. 76; section 3.2, Definition 3.35, printed/PDF p. 95.
- E. Gourgoulhon and J. L. Jaramillo, A 3+1 perspective on null hypersurfaces and isolated horizons, arXiv:gr-qc/0503113v2 · Section 2.2, (2.10)–(2.11), pp. 18–19; sections 2.6–2.7, (2.46)–(2.57) and Remark 2.8, pp. 28–31; section 5.6, (5.65), (5.71) and Remark 5.2, pp. 72–74; section 5.8, (5.114), p. 81 (printed and one-based PDF pages).