How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Komar flux equals the original stationary mass coefficient
Statement
On an original stationary end with , , , and , choose future with and , and the outward -unit normal to coordinate spheres in . With the future/outward Komar mass convention , one has . No sign of or maximality is assumed.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses of the Statement.
Goal: The asserted conclusion with its stated scope.
The original regular-data convention is ZFC, including the axiom of choice. Its restriction to countable families supplies the countable-choice hypothesis of the density-integration definition. Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime The Axiom of Choice
The end coefficients and derivatives have the original stationary bounds. Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
The lapse, shift and positive end orientation are as in the stationary extrinsic-decay interface. Extrinsic curvature decay on the original stationary end Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
For the induced positive metric on the compact smooth coordinate sphere , is its Riemannian volume density: in local surface coordinates , . The flux is the integral of its smooth scalar integrand times this density; compactness supplies compact support. The same conventions define for the unit round sphere. Riemannian volume density Integral of a compactly supported smooth density
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses of the Statement, with the density conventions of [F3] and the inherited choice convention [A1].
Goal: Evaluate the future/outward flux limit.
For a Killing field , . Thus . Here , , , and . The spatial-spatial Killing derivative is . Hence .
Write with , and let be the unit round metric. For tangent vectors at , the induced metric in this parametrization is . In a -orthonormal tangent frame this is , where every entry of is uniformly by [F1]. The two-by-two identity and the positive square root give by [F3]. In spherical coordinates the unit round metric has matrix , so for . Integrating gives ; the omitted poles and angular seam have zero two-dimensional coordinate measure, so contribute zero to the smooth-density integral.
The uniform estimate in step 1.1 and the density formula in step 1.2 give . Thus the limit exists and the stated normalization gives . The future/outward orientation was fixed in the contraction in step 1.1; no positivity of or maximality is used.
Depends on
- Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
- Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
- Extrinsic curvature decay on the original stationary end
- Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
- Riemannian volume density
- Integral of a compactly supported smooth density
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.